The two principle customs spring from Western painting and Chinese craftsmanship, backpedaling great over a thousand years in the two cases. The acknowledgment of an otherworldly component in scene workmanship is available from its beginnings in East Asian craftsmanship, drawing on Daoism and other philosophical customs, however in the West just winds up unequivocal with Sentimentalism.
Scene sees in craftsmanship might be completely nonexistent, or replicated from reality with differing degrees of precision. On the off chance that the basic role of a photo is to portray a genuine, particular place, particularly including structures conspicuously, it is known as a geographical view.[1] Such perspectives, amazingly regular as prints in the West, are frequently observed as sub-par compared to compelling artwork scenes, in spite of the fact that the refinement isn't generally significant; comparative biases existed in Chinese workmanship, where literati painting typically delineated nonexistent perspectives, while proficient court specialists painted genuine perspectives, regularly including castles and urban areas.
https://visualelsewhere.wordpress.com/2011/07/14/themistokles-von-eckenbrecher-utsikt-over-laerdalsoren-i-sognefjorden-olje-pa-lerret-1901/themistokles_von_eckenbrecher_utsikt_over_laerdalsoren/
Unless you are the original artist, not citing the source of images might be flagged for plagiarism. Here is a post on why this is bad, and here is how easy it is to find allowed photos.
Not explicitly indicating that the image you post is not your original work could be seen as plagiarism, especially if you claim or imply to be the original artist. Unless you clearly credit the original artists/photographers, you run the risk of being flagged and/or blacklisted by a growing number of anti-spam entities on Steemit.
If you are actually the original artist, please do reply, with supporting evidence, to let us know!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit