I wouldn't use 100 SP as a criteria, remember that Steem is inflationary. I'd rather say that you need at least 30 rep to flag (or some reasonable number).
Edit: I'm fine with a bigger number for rep, 40 or even 50.
RE: Throw-Away-Accounts is a problem - I suggest that in order to be allowed to FLAG a post - the account FLAGGING needs to have a MINIMUM of 50 positive posts and more then 100 SP
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Throw-Away-Accounts is a problem - I suggest that in order to be allowed to FLAG a post - the account FLAGGING needs to have a MINIMUM of 50 positive posts and more then 100 SP
This
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I would suggest 40, since all accounts start with 25, its quite easy to get 30 in a day.. Another topic that should be discussed is the flag vendetta from users that simply don't like when you tell them they're wrong
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Make it 50.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
50 50 we have 50... do i hear 55?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Where's the LIKE button, ya'll! This is hilarious.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
time is age, YES
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I agree. I think 40 rep would be good. That implies some level of curation experience.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit