Sounds like cryptocommunism to me.
RE: 2 weeks trial of capping total post rewards to $500 per blog post
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
2 weeks trial of capping total post rewards to $500 per blog post
2 weeks trial of capping total post rewards to $500 per blog post
Sounds like cryptocommunism to me.
I think this appeals more to those who have never made a post above $500. Content is king. If people like it, it should be voted on. What will the trending page be like when there are 300 posts all making $500. Curation rewards would be pretty worthless not for the average user, but whales as well.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah but it's democratic cryptocommunism. That makes it better, and there's no murder or starving.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Democratic communism; hmm, no where have I heard that before...
Cg
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Great! Let's 'split up the big whales' and redistribute their wealth hahah
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Exactly. It is not crypto-communism. I'm don't 100% believe in caps but it is worth testing out the hypothesis to see if it works. If it doesn't then fine.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hey, I'll eat whale. LOL
sorry, the Asian in me got really excited. :oD
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
ROFL @bendjmiller - only half an Asian. The other half is Heinz 57. That goes well with whale, right?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You have eaten an Asian whole and they are inside you hungry for whale meat? 😉
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit