not knowing...

J. gets arrested.

• Who ordered that and when - and who knew about this? In other words: is it possible or likely that J. knew this was about to happen? Is it possible he has been ordered to play along with a script already made?
• Is the person arrested beyond any doubt J.? Is there bio metric or other convincing proof? On whose authority?

J. gets jailed.

• If it is J., did he get swapped at some point?
• He is suicided. Or: he committed suicide?!
• The coroner signs for suicide, investigation follows on how it happened. What exactly is investigated?

We leave the suicide story at just one line. Thousands of hours of video on you tube speculate on what probably happened. Sleeping guards, camera's that did not work - it is not really worth going into this. Without access to facts all remains speculation. Most Americans do not really believe the FBI and DOJ investigations matter. They will create a narrative. Probably one of mishandling, incompetence and recommending some prison reform. The main function of these kind of investigations is to create a convenient narrative that cannot be disproved.

It is highly likely J. was not a lone actor. Ever since his Bear Stearns days he was hired as a fixer. Never acting on his own money. Here lies the real story: who operated J.? The Mob? A secret agency? Big Business?

Are all the people in his by now famous black book pedophiles? Did J. run a blackmail operation on a sex trafficking scheme? We do not expect any hard fact from any investigation into that. Take prince Andrew: CIA, NSA, Royal Family, MI6, Any Gov, FBI, DOJ: just some of the forces that protect the prince and are able and willing to cover up anything. No chance in hell any real fact finding will ever take place.

Probably this will end up as the Warren and NIST reports: the public knows very well nothing of it is true, but it also knows it is the official version and they just have to pretend it is true - because the rest follows from there. The narrative always has some purpose. The war on terror was a scenario on the shelf, long before 9/11. What really triggered 9/11 we will never know.

In the J. case there also will be a narrative. Maybe even some pawns will be sacrificed and we see some efforts to make us believe justice is served. It will never touch the real facts. We think J. is an operative and somebody operating him decided it was time to finish the asset. If they killed him or just put him trough a witness protection program now using him on some other job we will never know. All that we do know is that for the record he is a stiff that whacked himself. The narrative will run from there.

Not following the official story will put you in the unrewarding category of conspiracy theorists. The people producing official narratives know very well that the public will not buy it - but in the end will swallow it. And that is what matters for people in power. We believe most conspiracy theories anyway are produced by the conspirators themselves... Some are made just enough over the top to be easily dismissed as the work of some paranoid madman. A good scenario (like brushing asset J. from the news) already sketches out the conspiracy theories that have to be launched in order to deliver the official narrative and keep people busy with speculation.

In the J. case MSM is really over cooperative since it is scared as hell that a certain Bill is too deeply involved and any fact digging works against their sustained effort to get the DNC back into power. Bill has to be kept clean under any circumstance. As clean as a prince Andrew!

Guess the Alex Acosta deal is telling. He was told to back of. We live under a cloud of fear. Everything is classified or secret and if you try to mess with that you have some suits at your door without real names or identities but with the means and determination to whack you if you do not obey...

You can rant about the Deep State and the cover up of the J. alleged suicide. The people that call the shots are fine with that. They will only intervene when you have proof and facts (that will most likely get you killed) or when your following (popularity) gets too big.

Sad world... Let's close the J. case and just move on. Not worth your time. Just know that you do not know because you actually don't know anything except from narratives out there and that if you knew you would be with the fish...

If you think you should think about what did or did not happen, we advice to go to youtube and find Stefan Molyneux. He gives some direction what to look for. He assigns more reality to J. than we do. There is a reason for that. We are more paranoid.

We believe that every asset that has a public exposure is subject to scenario packaging. When you run an asset you know what possible exits can be necessary. Services operating assets will not let it come to something happening and than come with some reaction. The if then scenario's are in place and once triggered are executed.

Politicians and spooks and justice always get away with a narrative. They can always act surprised and always claim to react to something. What is presented like an event triggered by whatever rarely is. The most famous example of our times is the Merkel immigration hoax. She made it seem that her decision to have about a million immigrants flooding into the country, an therewith the EU, was in reaction to some urgent situation The simple truth is that years before it happened this scenario was already in place. Intelligence services long before knew what the flow of people would be and to authorities nothing was a surprise. The sad truth is that German elites became obsessed with Malthusian doom and gloom and went into believing they needed a few million people to stop population decline. One thing that scared them out of their minds is that they would have to pay labor when population would run scarce. A minimum wage of 8.5 Euro was introduced and was not acceptable to German industrial elites. They had no choice, they had to show they did not need German workers with rights. They preferred immigration workers for 3.5 Euro per hour. Much labor in Germany is close to slave labor - there is a long tradition of that... But that is not our subject here. The point is that narratives are created long before they are deployed. They sit in scripts, in packages. Once they are deployed it seems like something is happening, like something is actual. Keeping you busy... The J case proofs that works perfectly. Sad world.

<br /><center><hr/><em>Posted from my blog with <a href='https://wordpress.org/plugins/steempress/'>SteemPress</a> : https://cryptmove.com/2019/08/20/not-knowing/ </em><hr/></center>