lol... I hope you know what you're doing... I tend to see things a little differently...
July 11, 2021... 0.2 Hollywood Time...
RE: Gold to the Moon, Silver to Mars, and Clad Coinage to Pluto...
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Gold to the Moon, Silver to Mars, and Clad Coinage to Pluto...
This is on a different author. Authors vary because they have different followers and voters. Some authors have very aggressive voters. Some don't.
We can see though that at least for this author a 3m vote at 90% yielded less than a 3% vote a 3m15s. The 15s later vote got better curation returns than the earlier vote at 90%. My luck here actually looks pretty marginal since all the values are near/around 30%.
I only have one vote at 90%, so I still need more data.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Try it with 11, 100% Up-Votes per Day, for a Week and I believe you'll see a Very Big Difference...
July 11, 2021... 7.5 Hollywood Time...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I would need more data. Would need to be for a month. I think you're saying a week because of the week payout, but that's not really that important in data gathering. We just need variety of circumstances. I just need more data points over a significant period of time with enough randomness that I can build actual results from.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There. Approx 1 week's worth of 100% upvotes. Only 15% returns. It's actually pretty lousy. I feel like 1 week of 100% upvotes really isn't a good test though. It doesn't seem like a good way to gather data. I just just go back over my votes for the last several months and build a data set from that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Got a decent spread of vote %'s going here. Data over a week isn't good though. Really need to look at the data over months because we have some varying factors
From the above data though, it looks like 90% isn't a good bet; however, there are two reasons it could have turned out bad. Could have missed a vote from a while or that extra 12 seconds could mean a lot of other people got in votes sooner and I'm just not getting the curation. You can see that at 24s, it was definitely a miss. Probably should avoid voting entirely if it goes too late.
To know for sure, I need to more votes with varying times and luck.
3-4%, seems like I can pretty regularly get 30% curation. That's actually good. With more data, I'll know if I should bump that or not.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
To me, it looks like you're not doing very well... I'm seeing tiny returns...
July 11, 2021... 7.4 Hollywood Time...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah, but there's lots of them. You have to look at the percentages. If I spend $10 on one vote and get 5%, I'm only getting $0.5 back at once. I split that $10 vote up to 100 votes and get 30%. Each vote is only worth $0.10, but I'm getting 30% which is $0.0333. This comes out to approx $3.
If you're asking whether I'd get $3 from a hundred votes or just $0.5 from one vote, I'll take the $3. The returns are small on a per-vote basis. Accumulate them, and they're worth a ton.
Also, like I said, if I go small enough, I get steemit rounding up for me. Due to rounding errors, I get even more returns. My $3 return from $10 vote can easily become $10.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit