Nice overview. Unfortunately, much of social “science” research hasn’t been performed rigorously. By the time the study’s results are called into question, eager reporters looking for content have already broadcast the “results” of the study to the world.
RE: The Reputability and Credibility of Scientific Articles
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The Reputability and Credibility of Scientific Articles
Thanks for the comment. Hopefully in cases like this the reporter will correct their story if the study turns out to be questionable?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit