Science. You want to write about science because you like the community. You want to write about science because you think it is interesting. You have heard about something scientific on the news and now you want to share your newfound knowledge with the steemstem community. But Stop!! Did you check actual scientific sources? And I am talking about the good stuff, not just Wikipedia. No? Well, maybe I can help you.
Today, I want to show you a few websites and search engines that will help you to find scientific sources. While not all of them will give you exclusively open access content, it will make it significantly easier for you to find reliable, peer-reviewed scientific journal articles. I use these websites for my own research, not just for my stemit posts, but also for my scientific research at my university. Lets get going.
#1 Google Scholar
This is one that you may have heard about. Google Scholar should be your go to because it is easy to use and has an abundance of scientific sources. It works just like a regular Google search, only that you will find scientific sources. Let’s assume that you are looking for a journal article about CRISPR-Cas9, something that is currently very popular science. Just enter “CRISPR Cas9” into the search field and hit enter. Google Scholar will produce the following:
The first four sources are all from known scientific journals and publishers including Nature, Science and Elsevier. If you go down to the fifth source (cannot be seen in the screenshot), you will even find an article from Jennifer Doudna, the inventor of CRISPR Cas9.
I once had a lady tell me that Google Scholar should not be used for more than a high school science report. That lady never been in a science lab - Google Scholar is completely legitimate.
Google scholar is a great tool and it will help you tremendously. It has its limits, though. While the vast majority of search results are reliable, you will sometimes stumble upon some sources that are not that trustworthy. Those include books, most of the time. If you stick to articles published in known journals or by known publishers (Nature, Science, Elsevier, ACS among others) you should be fine. Another limitation is that many of these known publishers do not give out many free articles. You will find many interesting articles that you will not have access to. Here a tip: from my experience, it seems like review articles tend to be free more often than publications based on studies and experiments. Most of the time review articles are what you want. Furthermore, they cross reference articles, and thus are a valuable source for finding sources.
#2 NCBI
Yes, this is a government funded site. That does not change the fact that this data bank is still legitimate. Especially for biology, medicine and health related posts it is a great resource. If you google search NCBI, your first search result should read “National Center For Biotechnology Information”. Click on that and you will go to the NCBI Homepage.
As you can see, there are many resources available to you. You can look up genes, protein primary structures and many other things. The search on top of the page will be most interesting for you. Here you can type in what you are looking for. Let’s say you are interested in baking yeast because you want to know more about how your bread is made. On the left upper page you will find a link titled “PubMed Central”.
If you click on this you will be directed to a search results page with links to thousands of articles that were matched to your search. In this case, I got 2012 hits. If you click on PubMed Central you will get to the following page.
On the left hand side you see a few search filters, like year of publication, funding source and article attributes. I have not yet found an illegitimate article. However, we have the same major limitations that we have with Google Scholar: the amount of free sources. Many of the articles you will be interested in are not open source. However, this does not mean that you cannot use NCBI. You will find useful sources, but it will take you a little bit longer.
#3 C&EN
Google search “C EN” and you will find a results titled “C&EN | Chemistry News From Around The World”. Click on that link and you will get to the (C&EN homepage](https://cen.acs.org/index.html). C&EN stands for Chemistry and Engineering News and that is what this website is all about. While it does not give you a list of research articles, it rather gives you an overview over various news from the world of chemical research and chemistry in general.
I would recommend this website if you have problems finding an idea for your next stem post and if you have not found a good one under the #nsas. On this website you can find free videos, short posts and podcasts. It is not very technical and you will be able to understand almost anything if you are curious about science. Citing C&EN posts is legitimate for stemit, but it is not acceptable in a research environment (i.e. if you write a grant proposal or if you are writing a journal article).
#4 Nature Communications
This is my personal new favorite website. Nature Communications is a sub-journal of Nature, one of the three most impactful journals. This website gives you access to many Nature style articles. It works like most search engines: you enter in what you are interested in in the search field and hit enter. If you are not 100% sure what you are looking for you can just browse by subject, something I have been doing a lot lately.
Here you can select an area that is of interest to you. When you click on a theme that is of interest to you, you will be directed to a list of articles that fall under this category. Almost all of these articles are free. This “discovery” has changed my life. But I am just a very nerdy person. For you, this will give you access to free articles that are published in one of the top three scientific journals.
These are the four main sources that you can use to find scientific articles for your stem posts. There are many more out there, but access to these are often through an academic or research institution. One that I heavily use is “ACS Web Editions”. The ACS is the American Chemical Society. It is THE journal for chemical sciences. Anther one that is very powerful is SciFinder. I have access to it through my university.
#5 Science Direct
Science Direct is another science search engine. Unlike most of the above suggestions, it gives you the option to search specifically for open-access sources. It will give you a very long list with open access journals. Some of the journals are better than others. These open-access journals, sometimes charge authors to publish them. There is a bit of a difference in quality among these journals. However, this can still be a valuable source if you know what you are looking for.
A Word On Wikipedia
Generally, Wikipedia is a good starting source. I know that the steemstem curators do not mind the use of Wikipedia and that using Wikipedia as a source will not prevent you from receiving a stem upvote. Personally, I only use Wikipedia if I encounter something that I do not understand, and I know many professors at my university are doing that, too.
I guess using Wikipedia really is your own decision. Your articles will be more legitimate if you use any of the sources I recommend above. But nobody in the stem community will be against you for citing Wikipedia.
Bonus Source
This is not a scientific source, but it is interesting nonetheless. Retraction Watch is an organization that tracks spectacular retractions and gives background information about what happened. Science is not holy, there are some shady things going on. Retraction Watch sheds some light on some creepy scientists and their wrongdoings.
For people who are not in science: a retraction is when a paper is “unpublished”. This usually happens when scientists discover that the data is not reproducible, or when data or figures have been copied or if there are ethical problems or non disclosed conflicts of interest. This is one of the mechanisms that ensures that the scientific principle is being followed. While it does not provide you with sources for your post (unless you write about the “dark site of science”), it still is an entertaining read.
I hope this post proves to be helpful for some people. If you still have problems finding adequate sources, contact me. I am a steemstem mentor and you can find me on Discord.
I am only human, and only a chemist, so my knowledge of finding sources is obviously limited to my area of research. If one of you from the other sciences know of other websites please share them in the comments!
As always,
Cheers @lesshorrible!
Hey, thanks for posting this, primary sources are so important to high quality science writing. As someone that had experience writing both within and outside of academia I can attest to how frustrating it is to not have access to sources.
I’ve an additional “pro tip” for google scholar users:
If you find a paper that you are interested in but the first link doesn’t take you to the full text clicking the All x versions link may help you find a link that does
Click brings you here:
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you your tip! Cheers!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Also good call on including retraction watch, so important!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I was gonna say you should've included a section on how to access sources for which you don't have a subscription :P but I see that's already mentioned in the comments! (and, obviously, that's not the kind of thing to mention in the post itself!)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I mean SciHub is a grey zone I guess. And there are other ways to get restricted journal articles. But I decided to not share that because I do not want to "endorse" potentially (or definitely) illegal ways of getting scientific sources. There are ways, but the things I suggest should help people to get sufficient sources for writing their posts. Many stem posts use wikipedia, I just wanted to help people to get more sophisticated sources, even though some seem to be upset I did not mention SciHub.
Thank you for your comment. Cheers!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Great summary! Thanks for providing this to those who didn't know about these sources yet.
I hope it gets a @de-stem share - Would be reasonable!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I hope not haha, cause this is not in German. If you want you can translate this and post it in #de-stem. Or I do it later, but it wont be before tomorrow your time. Cheers!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Oups - my language confused brain doesn't distinguish anymore 🙄
There is no hurry. I would be Happy to see it in German too. 🤗
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I like this post.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you very much for this publication @lesshorrible. Very valuable information for users. I did not know the existence of these pages, it's always good to learn something new.
congratulations for being on the podium of the best of the week. You deserve it.
Happy day!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for sharing your amazing article @lesshorrible. This would be very helpful to all the authors for their research on STEM articles or even to their work. Worth resteeming and should be read by everybody on the community. Kudos!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Nice list! A few of these I wasn't even aware myself.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Glad I could help. Cheers!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I have not heard about some of those before. Thanks for writing this down, this post goes in my bookmarks :D
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You are welcome! Again, there are other sides you can use (as mentioned by others above). Cheers!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Brilliant.. This would help a lot in searching for something.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Q: How To Find Scientific Sources For Free?
A: scihub
But @lesshorrible : you should also write about , how fucked up is the current research publication business model?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I was wondering if someone would mention scihub. Without endorsing (or not endorsing) it, I'd like to mention for anyone using it that they should be wary of sites pretending to be scihub (whose url moves about), especially those that want you to install software. I've had more than one colleague from places without access to articles fall for that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Recently many of the sci-hub domains got banned and the reliable one is sci-hub.tw only
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm glad you mentioned Scihub @dexterdev.
Scihub is a very valuable resource for anyone who doesn't have access to the journal subscriptions of an academic university. It might be dubiously legal, but Journals that charge $40 to access a single article are not allowing for any reasonable options other than Scihub.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I completely agree with your point. :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hey @dexterdev, I was thinking about writing a commentary, but after talking to faculty about this business model I think that I understand why they charge for access to their journals. I mean, they have to pay for the servers, reviewers, etc. However, the price they charge is debatable. What would be cool to see is an "alternative" science journal that summarizes science articles on a more understandable level and spread them for free (kinda like here on steemit). Thanks for your comment. Cheers!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't think all journals pay reviewers. Maybe I am wrong.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I dont know. It also does not really matter. I am just trying to help people find what is available to them. Cheers!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Since you pointed out the reviewers being paid, I mentioned this.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That´s fair. Cheers!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you very much for posting this valuable blog.
The information presented in this post of yours is indeed very important for authors and researchers in general. I must admit I only knew of Google Scholar, of all websites included, before reading your post, so thank you for the information.
ps: I often find information labeled as eligible for reuse on usgs.gov , however I honestly don't know if it could be included in this list.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you for sharing your source! I love learning something new through comments so thank you! I will include this on the list as soon as I have some time. I do not see a reason why this website should not be used for scientific posts, especially since it provides data. I have to admit that I am somewhat sceptical of US government websites since I attended a research talk and learned about how influence the EPA seems to be. Anyways, glad I could help, and thank you for your input! Cheers!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I love you man. No homo! You have made it so much easier doing science-related projects. I'm definitely going to recommend this post to my friends who have been having issues getting materials for their research works.
All the best!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Very useful post. Thanks. For me as biologist all sources are very interesting, especially NCBI. I didn't know about it before.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Glad I could help! Cheers!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hey, just wanted to let you know that I will now flag your spam :) Cheers!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit