Metacognition - staying in charge of your own thoughts

Metacognition, often called "thinking about thinking", is you being in charge of your thoughts. You are thinking about your own mental processes and being aware of them. It is the key to better learning and more efficient problem solving just as it is to challenging your beliefs and thinking patterns. It is at the heart of many types of therapy and educational systems because you are reviewing your knowledge about a certain topic, assessing your abilities and predicting the outcome of your actions.

Cognition refers to thinking. The applications of cognitions are conscious reasoning, interpreting sensory input, empathizing, guiding physical actions etc. Your cognition changes as you gain new experience and when it comes to research, you have to keep in mind that attention, memories, knowledge acquisition and retention, language learning, and logical reasoning all play a vital part in understanding human cognition. Metacognition goes beyond that and deals with knowing why we think or do the way we think or do in a certain moment. It is our mental self-awareness that, if practiced regularly, can be a deciding factor between succeeding or failing at anything. From your psychological health to your job performance, knowing who you are is a strong asset you will benefit from.

Being able to change your thinking means you have to first be aware of it and recognize it. Without having strong self-control, you will not be able to stop your thinking patterns. Self-control is your ability to subdue your behavior, emotions, thoughts, and impulses in order to achieve some long-term goal.

What makes humans different from the rest of the animal kingdom is our pre-frontal cortex that is larger than in other mammals and the root of our self-control. We do not respond immediately to every impulse but plan instead and evaluate alternative actions to avoid consequences that we would not prefer. Our ability to exert self-control or our will-power is what makes us different from each other and it has been linked time and time again how those with better will-power tend to be more successful in various areas of life.

The most famous study of self-control is known as “the marshmallow test" and was conducted by the Stanford professor Walter Mischel in the 1960s. His team tested hundreds of children around the ages of 4 and 5 years old by giving them a simple choice; have one marshmallow right away or two marshmallows later. They brought the child into a room and put a marshmallow in front of it. The child was told that the researcher was going to leave the room and if the child does not eat the treat, it will be given two treats when the researcher returns. If it eats it, it would not receive the second one. Some children ate the marshmallow as soon as the researcher left the room, some were fidgeting in their seats for a while before eating it, and some waited until researcher came back after 15 minutes and got to eat two treats. The most interesting part of the study came years later.

According to researchers at the University of Rochester, yes it can. They replicated "the Marshmallow experiment" but added the environmental factor. They split the children into two groups and exposed them to a series of unreliable and reliable experiences. If a child was from the first group, they would first give it a small box of crayons with a promise they would bring a bigger one but didn't and they gave it a small sticker with a promise to get a better one but didn't. Children from the second group received what was promised. When the actual "marshmallow test" came, the second group waited an average of four times longer than the first group.

You can retrain your mind to develop a more positive mindset and become better at self-control. All you have to do is be consistent with making small improvements until "it sticks". Repetition is how we learn and remember things. Your ability to delay gratification can be trained to become stronger if you apply positive reinforcement and have small goals, so small that you are sure to achieve them. Increase your goals gradually until your brain becomes confident that you do have self-control and no problem with rethinking a certain action or a thought.

The "meta" part in the word metacognition refers to higher-order cognition about cognition. It is thinking about thinking and it has two dimensions: metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive regulation.

Metacognitive knowledge means that you are aware of your cognitive abilities (how much you know about a certain task, your knowledge of different strategies and when to use them, your strong opinions about different topics etc.). Metacognitive regulation, on the other hand, deals with your ability to monitor and control your cognitive process. It is about realizing that a certain strategy does not work and choosing another. The simple way to understand this is with the example of reading. You first read a part of the text (cognitive or object level), then you stop and check if you understand before deciding to continue or read again. That monitoring of your cognition and control of it by deciding to re-read is the meta level. Another example would be having a strong opinion about how to react around a certain group of people. Stopping before reaction and thinking if that is the right approach and concluding that either it is or either it isn't (based on previous experience and data predicting the future ones) is metacognition. Self-assessment and talking to yourself (inside or outside voice depending on the situation) are ways to do it.

Being overconfident and good at metacognition are two things that do not go well together. Metacognition is all about questioning yourself while your overconfidence will prevent you from doing that. Being confident about your action or conclusion is a good thing but only if it comes after metacognition, not before. The order of those things is important.

All of us (some more frequently than others) tend to overestimate our knowledge and/or abilities. We give conclusions without asking ourselves how did we get to those conclusions. There is a difference between objective and foolish confidence, one comes after and the other comes before metacognition. Re-evaluating our set of skills and thinking patterns is crucial to any progress and making the right decision about anything. Questioning ourselves is important and paves the way to new discoveries and improvement.