Basically, a store of significant value is a resource that can maintain its incentives in the long run. Let's say you buy a resource today. This resource will be a reasonable warehouse of significant value if you are sure that its value will not decrease in the long run. As a result, it will be as important later as it is today.
Two features turn a resource into a reasonable repository of reasonable value:
To get started, the resource must be solid. For example, accept food. Let's say you buy a slice of pizza. When you buy it, it has absolutely inherent value - we as humans should eat, right? In any case, let's assume you keep it in a safe for a long time. Do you think it will have a similar value at that point? With all the shape and rot he'll be collecting, he's sheltered to indicate he probably doesn't deserve anything.
All things considered, it's arguably better, but there's no certainty that it will maintain an incentive later on. Dry pasta is modest and immediately accessible, making it easy for anyone to fill the market with it.
As stated, resources should not only be strong, but also insufficient. For example, take the money in your pocket. Regardless of the number you have, these banknotes and coins will generally not have a similar incentive in the long run. The more units are made, the less important they become (like some kind of pasta).
Do you remember the accounts we would have with our grandparents? When I was a kid, we could have bought it for a penny! How far will a high-five get you these days? The main reason for this is the expansion and expansion in the cost of commercial goods and enterprises due to the fact that more fiat units are made by the public authority.
Compare the above models with gold. Gold, as we know it as a whole, is strong and inadequate. Regardless of whether interest in gold will grow or not, it is unlikely to just print more gold. Individuals need to go underground and take them out.
