If you were a government that was constrained by a constitution, how would you conduct domestic surveillance without running afoul of said constitution?
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Undercover surveillance?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It would still run afoul of the Constitution, at least by the letter of said document. A bit like the question, "If nobody knows you stole something, did you steal something?" Note that I'm not talking about agents sitting on the street outside your home watching you, or even following you in public. I'm talking about gaining access to your private communications, documents, financial records and so on. And no, said records being under the control of third-parties does not mean they thereby become public, regardless of what government wants to say to the contrary.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit