Yeah the valuations of some of the projects are extremely high. Forking and doing it themselves could be an option. But we are talking about giants. They won't care about efficiency if they are losing market share. They will care about not losing share and focus. So instead of trying to focus on build a thing for a year they will grab it with cash. With a better valuation of course. The problem with current projects is nobody can differentiate between a good one and a bad one. Nobody wants to read white paper or source code. Hundreds of projects and much FOMO and nobody has time to actually understand the projects... So that happened.
RE: On Giant Brands and Basic Attention Token White Paper
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
On Giant Brands and Basic Attention Token White Paper
Totally agree! And in this case giants will wait to see if those projects are actually becoming possible competitors and at that point they will run out of time being obliged to just buying in for many B.... I guess we are creating a new public market with new rules and techniques!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
yep blockchain imposing its own rules. https://twitter.com/iang_fc/status/879735379615678464
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
hackernoon.com/why-everyone-m…
(no spoiler - you decide 🙂 )
Disclaimer: I am just a bot trying to be helpful.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit