Just read what I (already) wrote: the algorithm cannot really know if your self-voting rate is 0.0, because it doesn't know how many accounts you own. That's why the 'official' self-vote rate doesn't matter much for Voting CSI.
Yes, these two accounts upvoting me have a very sensitive algorithm which detects whenever @jaki01 has to spend too much precious time being involved in time consuming discussions, and then grant him some smart money as compensation.
However, Voting CSI also detects on how many different accounts (which are also not upvoting each other) @jaki01 spreads his valuable upvotes and thus grants him the well deserved high rating.
RE: 100 DAYS OF STEEM : Day 33 - Tackling Abuse on Steem - Part I - What is Abuse?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
100 DAYS OF STEEM : Day 33 - Tackling Abuse on Steem - Part I - What is Abuse?
"Just read what I (already) wrote: the algorithm cannot really know if your self-voting rate is 0.0, because it doesn't know how many accounts you own. That's why the 'official' self-vote rate doesn't matter much for Voting CSI."
Account with 100% selfvoting has 0.0 CSI.
When other accounts have negative CSI it means that it's better to vote yourself instead of voting other.
OK I got it !
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit