My guess it that most hive folks are still around while they wait for the power down and will leave after. It is clear they are one of your major concerns. The idea of a 3-day power down period was strongly supported by many of the witnesses. Implementing that or something similar would certainly make them leave sooner.
RE: 100 DAYS OF STEEM : Day 33 - Tackling Abuse on Steem - Part I - What is Abuse?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
100 DAYS OF STEEM : Day 33 - Tackling Abuse on Steem - Part I - What is Abuse?
The 3 day doesn't make sense though... the payout window is 7 days. So I can vote with my full voting power, powerdown, powerup another account and vote on the same post again for double the value?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I agree.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The problem with solving abuse on the platform is not really about Hive at all is it. Using other platforms is not abuse and there was plenty of abuse before Steem forked.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's not about Hive at all. There are bigger problems around here but 2 out of 5 types of abuse suggested by steemit inc were about hive users. That's why I mentioned that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Pretty crazy that they mention Hive when talking about abuse.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit