View this post on Hive: Test delete
8 years ago by eeks (68)
$23.03
- Past Payouts $23.03
- - Author $11.53
- - Curators $11.49
30 votes
- + nextgencrypto: $7.006 (100%)
- + riverhead: $6.724 (100%)
- + abit: $5.782 (100%)
- + steemychicken1: $1.434 (100%)
- + benjojo: $0.895 (100%)
- + eeks: $0.784 (100%)
- + tuck-fheman: $0.200 (100%)
- + blakemiles84: $0.089 (100%)
- + juanlibertad: $0.036 (100%)
- + linouxis9: $0.034 (100%)
- - steemit4000: $-0.024 (-100%)
- + oholiab: $0.021 (100%)
- + radpansen: $0.011 (100%)
- + sean0010: $0.010 (100%)
- + venuspcs: $0.006 (100%)
- + bunny: $0.006 (100%)
- + tobixen: $0.004 (100%)
- + r4fken: $0.003 (100%)
- + pstrident: $0.001 (100%)
- + jbrukh: $0.001 (100%)
- … and 10 more
Well-said, eeks. You even have the support of 'a founding ethereum member' (https://distributed-autonomous-society.quora.com/A-Lesson-in-Humility?filter&nsrc=2&snid3=151396221)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I just came across that myself and was going to mention it, good catch!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The real question is this... Why is it only paying $22.09 after scoring an inbound link like that? Something isn't right with that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Really interesting perspective. I love the "eth's value is the ethereum community's constructive collaborative nature" comment. This can be applied to any community. Those that collaborate more effectively than others will survive. The Darwinian evolution of blockchain networks is fiercely underway.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hmm the Shapeshift.io shcool of pay the attacker huh.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Community can always just hard fork him into non-existence if he doesn't play ball and the community has the will.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This is equivalent to extortion/ransom. No such agreement would be enforceable, and honoring it would set a bad precedent.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Honoring it would set a great precedence for future massive contracts to not be completely destroyed by attackers.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What makes you think he or she wouldn't run off with that money too?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Etherium has Turing completeness, they can sign a contract... preferably without bugs this time.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There is also the possibility that the attacker considers Ethereum a "shitcoin" and wants it to die. I heard someone claiming to be the attacker came into slack and said just that and is offering miners a rather large bounty to not accept the soft fork. I don't know if anyone can verify if it was the attacker or not, from what I've heard he really doesn't have a way to prove it, but I don't know about that. If this is true and the miners accept his bribe, he gets a much larger bounty.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit