#ThePeoplesBrexit Open Letter to Nigel Farage @Nigel_Farage and Gerard Batten @GerardBattenMEP
Gentlemen. The Peoples Brexit has served NOTICE on the EU, we are NOT their Citizens!; Please attend: https://www.change.org/p/donald-tusk-the-peoples-brexit-service-notice-on-the-eu-we-revoke-you-not-your-citizens
TWEET THIS OPEN LETTER HERE: https://twitter.com/JohnTheWhite1/status/1115583611804299265
We have had enough of the failed political establishment of the UK and its delusional inability to even comprehend the basics of Britain’s current relationship with the EU: or play so dumb it’s just painful bad acting.
Since March 29th, we have sent multiple open letters to key persons and decision makers, primarily in the EU, to push the argument THEY are best served seeing the back of us on April 12th! With three days still to go we will see: we like the noises we are hearing, not just from France, but Belgium, Holland, Spain, Italy, Poland, Hungary, and unlike the mainstream media do see the very real possibility of a NO DEAL VETO situation finally throwing us out this week.
https://steemit.com/thepeoplesbrexit/@john-the-white/thepeoplesbrexit-open-letter-to-jean-claude-juncker-junckereu
https://steemit.com/thepeoplesbrexit/@john-the-white/thepeoplesbrexit-open-letter-to-guy-verhofstadt-guyverhofstadt
https://steemit.com/thepeoplesbrexit/@john-the-white/thepeoplesbrexit-open-letter-to-prime-minister-theresa-may-theresamay
https://steemit.com/thepeoplesbrexit/@john-the-white/thepeoplesbrexit-open-letter-to-french-president-emmanual-macron-emmanuelmacron-dutch-prime-minister-mark-rutte-minpres-european
https://steemit.com/thepeoplesbrexit/@john-the-white/thepeoplesbrexit-open-letter-to-sir-alan-duncan-mp-alanduncanmp-donald-tusk-eucopresident-jean-claude-juncker-junckereu-and-the
Soon we will know one way or another: which brings us to our thoughts of what comes after: which brings us to you: and as the former leader of UKIP and now leader of the Brexit Party Nigel, and as the current leader of UKIP who has changed the party dramatically last few months Gerard: we do have some things we want to say to both of you.
Nigel: we are not impressed that you have not given the very real chance of an EU imposed NO DEAL more publicity on your Radio Show since April 12th. We also were not impressed when you started to talk more and more about a 2nd Referendum from the start of last year: sure you have always been against it, but you gave it oxygen and were hardly vigorous in making what should have been the obvious Brexiteer view: no bloody way!
No-where in any of your talk about the possibility of a 2nd Referendum have we ever heard you say it would be out of order: because it would be bloody unfair! All true Brexit activists are bracketed by social media and can probably expect 30 day Facebook bans out of the blue: 29 days before the vote! This happened in France during the Presidentials, neutralising networks of contacts and shutting citizens out of online social debate they are passionate about: because their passion doesn’t match the globalists views. While the rabid trolls and enfant terrible of Globalism are aloud to defecate at will!
Let alone the political and media bias, the vast amounts of globalist foreign money (Soros!) swilling all around Remain, the incessant demonising and talking down of the Leave Majority! Our democracy is hanging by the thread under this sustained assault, and we CANNOT allow 2016’s very hard-won victory to be swindled away by a bent second vote!
Why Nigel, do you not make these obvious self-evident and fact-supported points?
And then we come to your Brexit Party: a party whose springboard platform depends on Brexit NOT happening; on either March 29th or April 12th!
You need us to take part in Euro-Elections to get the springboard from their proportional representation system for The Brexit Parties launch. We see you cultivating thousands of twitter follows in prepeartion. In a PR election you can have a straight fight vs the UKIP vote for vote share and maximise your potential profile: aided even more if ERG members defect to The Brexit Party once you’ve bulked it up. In this, we see the continuance of UKIP’s previous use under your leadership as a Tory Pressure group. The difference is between now and 2014, is back then it was the Tory’s who needed pressuring: now they are sinking fast! Clearly, the need for a new vessel to sail the political water is paramount, because you’ll never purge the Tory Party of the stooges.
But all of this planning and reasoning, either subconsciously or deliberately, limits your vision and the obvious chance to push the EU now to set us free doesn’t seem to have occurred or appealed to you. Why have you not told your listeners to bombard EU decision makers with tweets and emails over the last two weeks? Why have you left it to US, #ThePeoplesBrexit to do what needs to be done?
Gerard. To you, we would like to say; you have earned our trust as we have watched your performance as UKIP leader over the last year. But that hasn’t been easily given.
Henry Bolton was a disaster and when you stepped into the void, we didn’t know what to expect and many where past caring. Then your three months became one year, and we noted this meant you would be leader past Brexit Day, and we didn’t know what to expect from UKIP: would it still be a meaningful force? Could it recover from the savaging it took in 2017? Would the Donors and the NEC keep repressing the populism of the membership?
Then we saw you on the streets of London shaking the bucket proclaiming your support for Tommy Robinson. We saw the funding this was bringing in for UKIP, and were very cynical. Then in the autumn, when Tommy put out his challenge to the NEC to allow member democracy, many thought you were going to do what UKIP had done many times before, and shut down the populist surge. Not so! As we now understand it the Tory linked Donors have GONE, and UKIP’s destiny is in its members hands as never before.
Back to Nigel for a moment:, it’s over Tommy that you did yourself major damage last year. There was no need to like the man or agree with him (but why not Nigel? You backed “ban the burka” in the past…) to stand up for the truth that was clear to the world across the internet: Tommy Robinson was being stitched up! And the state is still at it, threatening to prosecute him again for a contempt that has not even been defined and “damage to case” that was non-existent. You showed your prejudice with some ire Nigel: it wasn’t pretty.
Gerard, by taking on the issue of Islamic integration, you are speaking for the majority of communities that have been on the rough end of the chaotic and abusive immigration policies of the last couple of decades where problems have been allowed to escalate and become ever more toxic, rather than be addressed. It is vital that SOMEONE in politics has the guts to talk about the unmentionable, and UKIP has a proud tradition in this regard you are continuing. And we also know many ethnic communities share white British concerns about the problem of non-intergrated Islam and the risk of extremist cells forming in towns and cities across the land.
If, as the “received wisdom” seems to think, Britain will be denied Brexit and forced into a long extension by the venal weakness of our own political class, Euro Election will go ahead. And the Brexit Party and UKIP can compete for vote share without too much overall harm to the Brexit cause: it will even up in the end, and your parties will get MEP’s each.
But what if those EuroElections DON’T happen, because by some turn of events, we actually get out at the end of the week?
Its UKIP in place to fight and benefit from council elections: nothing for The Brexit Party there: but what about a general election?
The high likely hood is a general election will be fought over the long time obsolete first past the post system, that wastes the majority of votes cast. Then we are in a different story altogether. Every constituency will be its own cut throat race. Every vote for UKIP or The Brexit Party is harming the chances of the other, and the more diluted the populist vote is, the more the chance another system serving sell-out Tory or Labour Remoaner will stay IN. Let alone when the field also now includes English Democrats, Democrats and Veterans and more.
We don’t hear anything from either of you as to what you would do about this. Without those Euro-Elections, The Brexit Party would be going from a cold start in a post-No Deal Brexit General Election, although it might benefit from potential defections from the ERG and others. While UKIP has the track record of fighting, and the historic high of 2015: which of course resulted in only one seat not the 84 it would have under PR.
What are you going to do about this? Gerard, you have spoken against electoral pacts and alliances: and you also have a negative attitude about people coming back to UKIP who have left over the past 2/3 years. This is in our view a very negative attitude, not least because UKIP has squandered so much talent ripping itself to bits with leader elections since Nigel abandoned it. What, seriously, did you expect web activists and youth campaigners to do when modernising ideas were smashed down and Bolton disrespected them right to their face? Changing this approach could re-cement and re unify the UKIP vote. New approaches are necessary to avoid the same old traps of the FPRP system and we would like to see you bend.
It seems to us, the reason we no longer have UKIP vs Tories, and now have the choice UKIP vs Brexit Party for the Brexit choice, is really about class. For it is class that is Britain’s eternal obsession. In the referendum, these considerations were swept aside in the duality of the choice, but now, these attitudes start to really matter.
We would not say you are against the working-class Nigel: not at all; but it is clear your mindset is one of the middle to upper class aspirational stock broker class. Nothing wrong with that, its who you are. Yet, when we look at your Brexit Party we see a middle-class party that has formed from the strategic choice to turn its back on some of the awkward yuckyness going on in working class areas.
Equally, we would not say you are against the middle class Gerard, but it is clear where you are rooting UKIP’s foundations by refusing to abandon the ordinary persons very pressing concerns about their communities.
In this, it seems to us not all, but many, will resolve the issue of who to support on the basis of if they identify more with the middle class economic Brexit Party, or working class social/community UKIP message.
Can you not then work out something sensible between you not to stand in each other’s way?
Whatever happens this week: Elections will come again.
How you both handle that is something EVERYONE will be watching with keen concern.
We expect you to work together sensibly.
We expect you to resolve the issues so both parties have a fair crack at gaining their core votes support: without elections degenerating into a shit-show of missed opportunities and the PEOPLE being stuffed with more of the same-old failed LIBLABCON….
If you foul this up, and if the populist vote is smashed against itself allowing the LIBLABCON to have it all their way AGAIN:
NEITHER of you will be forgiven! EVER!
Those who rise on the backs of the people can find it’s a damn hard face-palm of a fall…
Great the shame of a “peoples champion” whose people decide they have taken the piss…
We do not say that you do: but never take the public, your supporters or their intelligence for granted. There is a right way and a wrong way for both of you, as leaders, to walk.
Our votes will go to those who show by actions aligning with words they walk the same way our expectations travel, and act in the interest of the NATION above all else!
Despite our strong feedback, we thank you both for all that you do and all you have done, with great sincerity, and equally for your time and consideration today.
We are #ThePeoplesBrexit
