— SteemCN

RE: Big Bang Theory or Steady State Theory

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Big Bang Theory or Steady State Theory

View the full context

josediccus (75) in threespeak • 5 years ago

Big bang is obviously of the perception that the universe is constantly changing, evolving and you know moving and a particular type of adaptation, I don't know of the other theory maybe SSC or so never heard of it maybe it's because it's not universally viable. Thanks for bringing this one by the way

threespeak

5 years ago by josediccus (75)

$0.00

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!

Sort Order:

Trending

[-]

steemenginee (45) · 5 years ago

The idea of the "Universe Being Constant and Eternal", itself has no essence and contradicts natures own principle of Nothing is permanent. Though there were many theories in past these two theories Big Bang Theory and Steady-State Theory were widely considered scientific communities, moreover, very recently in the year 1993, Quasi-steady state cosmology (QSS) was suggested by a group of three scientists, this model depicts creation happening within our existing universe, the mini-bangs, little bangs, if not big bangs.

$0.00

[-]

wayo (61) · 5 years ago

I just explained it to @aceeca , in the comment below

Mr. Jayant V. Narlikar, Fred Hoyle and Geoffrey Burbidge together proposed the Quasi Steady State Cosmos, by the way the year was 1993. If you want I can request to add you to the our closed group of space science enthusiast. Sounds interesting ???

I request you to please be active on Steem, together we will make this a very happening place for space enthusiast and astronomy lovers.

$0.00