I suggest that all funds go into @tqn and @tqn upvote TQ users posts until they collect what was indicated in their balance on December 24th,2017.
TQ users can post a single post entitle « TQ rescue post – week xx »
Process
- Finish the audit
- The audit must be accepted by each party.
- Upvoting posts until the recue amount is reach
We will discuss upvoting rules.
I suggest taking 1 VIVA = $10 and 1 VIP = 1 VIVA for the value of VIP and VIVA
Take 1 iVx = 1 gVx
What will be the value for 1 Crown ?
What will be the value for 1 TR ?
When everybody get their funds back, TQ users will decide in which venture to invest @tqn funds.
I wish you have a better proposal.
This is the responsibility of Tradeqwik not steem.
There is no way that these values will be fulfilled as they are overvalued and only reached part of the time with most valuations being well under these levels.
What we need is a way to add value to the Tradeqwik and VIVA (eco)systems.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"What we need is a way to add value to the Tradeqwik and VIVA (eco)systems."
Absolutely. The only possible way for VIVA to survive this is to create something (anything) that actually creates value. Running an exchange could possibly do that (ala BTC-e / WEX), but that would require actually fixing the bugs. All the iVX that doesn't have a gVX counterpart also needs to be removed, because all it takes is one of those going up 100x and it's game over. In my opinion, iVX that has a gVX counterpart should be left alone, since people can trade it.
That said, it's still going to be very difficult to pull a resurrection of TQ off. The biggest problem will simply be paying for the work to be done.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think it is a start, but it will take a really long time
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I guess 90 % of users have only small amounts then if there are only few big investors left, it can be faster, but I do not have any data on the spread.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Steemit is a good way to do that but other steemit users could see it as spam and stealing the reward pool and be downvoted by the whales.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I guess most of us are writing enough real posts.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I must abstain from voting for that, too.
@rickyjrx
The reward pool is for 'good' content.
Having said that, I won't vote against it, either.
Ya'll will have to figure it out amongst yourselves.
Then I will have to decide whether to accept or reject the rewards, if y'uns vote for it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post received a 5.250 SBD (62.79%) upvote from @upvotewhale thanks to @chrisaiki! For more information, check out my profile!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit