It is rumoured that the US Supreme Court has ruled that anyone who is injected with a patented genetic sequence thereby becomes a patented product with no human rights because they are no longer human but now “trans-human”. The claimant reads from what he claims is this US Supreme Court ruling and he dictates a link. The link doesn’t work and nothing but debunking of this claim can readily be found on the internet. That very fact tempts sceptics like me to say, “AHA! The “fact checkers" are hiding it and debunking it so it must be true!” I’m sceptical of this. I feel like I’m being taken for a ride.
I think I will agree with the professors of law who debunk this claim. Professor Jorge Contreras makes sense by saying that the implanting of a patented substance or device into a human does not make that human a patentable product. I know that Klaus Schwab is a fountain of loose talk about "trans-human" but that's all that is, braggadocio. His digital slavery is a threat but, fancy high tech fantasies aside, it’s not a new threat, just a renewal of the threat that Hitler posed (and by the way that’s not a co-incidence, it’s a continuation). Slavery is alive and well today but that slavery, including sex trafficking, is illegal in our laws including US law and this crime needs no high tech excuse nor does it require a stamp of approval from the US Supreme Court. I quote:
University of Utah law professor and adjunct professor in human genetics Jorge Contreras, who has written a book on the Myriad Genetics Supreme Court case, told AAP FactCheck the claims in the Instagram post are “patently absurd”.
Prof Contreras said the post was correct that the Supreme Court ruled human DNA could not be patented because it was a product of nature. However, the same ruling did not determine that the human genome could be patented if it was modified, or that those who received a vaccine which modified their genome could be patented, he added.
The abolition of slavery cost America about 1/30th of its population dead and maimed between 1861 and 1865. If such a war were fought today it would cost 11 million casualties. The 14th Amendment abolishing slavery is as much a foundation of the US government as the Declaration of Independence. The terrible Civil War that led to its enactment was as much a revolution as the revolutionary war. The US Supreme Court reestablishing slavery, basically defining humans as property, is just not believable.
I'm certainly not saying that we are not under threat. The attempt to create a world-wide digital pass system is the real threat. It is an extra-legal, illegal threat. Those who threaten to impose this system world wide and who apparently have our governments and our educational institutions right up to all of our universities in some sort of a hammer-lock are the real threat. They are attempting to normalize a sort of digital slavery which will have the effect of nullifying all the laws and guarantees of rights and freedoms we in Canada, the USA, the UK and Western Europe have enjoyed especially since these laws and guarantees were affirmed by the victory over Nazi Germany. The imposition by coercion of a world-wide Vaccine Passport through global high technology violates the Nuremberg Code and in effect nullifies the victory over Nazi Germany. That is what the scheme to establish a digital passport was designed to do. That is what makes the struggle against this digital passport truly World War Three.