I have a philosophical question.
Okay, not a heavily philosophical question. On some days, I can't even pronounce philosophical. Sometimes I can't get past "phil". Besides, it's actually more of a horticultural question.
Two lilac bushes have grown behind our house since I bought the property, some thirty years ago--and they weren't young then. I love the scent of lilacs, and seeing them bloom is another sign that winter is over.
You know, I may have a photo of how they used to look. Hold on ...
You have to look behind me to see the ... okay, I couldn't find an old photo on my computer, and I'm too lazy to go looking. Anyway, you can see they were pretty healthy bushes, verging on trees. But now? Now they're older, and I've been pruning off dead branches for years. Despite that, I didn't notice until a couple of years ago that different bushes and trees were growing up among them, no doubt planted by various birds and small animals in the course of them, um, relieving themselves. Last fall I finally went through and (I thought) trimmed out everything that wasn't lilac, leaving a handful of sickly leftovers that I hoped would come back strong.
This spring something did indeed come back strong, but it wasn't the lilacs. I'd completely missed two trees that were growing up among the lilac bushes. I took this photo of them in poor light, then tried to correct the photos in an equally poor way, but this gives you an idea of what they were like when they blossomed:
The darker foliage you see below them are the original lilac bushes, which bloomed at about the same time. They're greatly reduced but still going, as is the small white lilac bush we planted further to the right a few years ago.
But one of them has to go.
So here's my question to you, the plant experts/amateur/armchair growy-persons. Which ones should go? I'd rather have the lilacs, honestly, but those other trees are bigger at this point (and too big to transplant). Should I give up on the lilacs? Or try to transplant some of them? Heck, for all I know those new trees are invasive, or poisonous, or dropped here by Martians to take over Earth plants. Any opinions?
Don't be afraid to upset me: My bark is worse than my bite. (Get it? Never mind.)
http://markrhunter.com/
https://www.amazon.com/-/e/B0058CL6OO
https://www.barnesandnoble.com/s/"Mark R Hunter"
Well, a diffucult question. I wonder why it needs changing, if they all grow fine. Are they blocking too much of the view on the beautiful barn roof (or whatever that is) behind them? :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well, the new trees--whatever the heck they are--are indeed growing fine, but they're killing my lilacs! Unless it's just old age that's killing the lilacs.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well, I'm not a gardening specialist, but it could be the age of the lilacs. Why don't you just plant a few new ones in the middle and see what happens.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Right where the cherry trees used to be ... I'm considering it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit