What He Said FridaysteemCreated with Sketch.

in trump •  7 years ago 

This past Friday, President Trump made a pretty long and well-received speech to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at their annual meeting in National Harbor, MD. I'm sure you heard it; I did, and there was a lot of interesting content. President Trump is nothing if not a different kind of speaker.

But that was not what I noted for Friday, as far as his speaking.

On his way over from the White House to National Harbor, as he was leaving to head there to speak, there was a brief impromptu exchange with reporters. The content of their questions was mostly in regard to gun control, but it isn't so much the content that mattered.

It was that it happened at all, and how, and with what attitude. As brief as it was, there were a few questions when the press corps started calling out to the president and he stopped and replied. He did not look rushed, and he appeared to be wanting to give thoughtful answers, which I felt that he did.

It absolutely struck me at the time that this exchange seemed unusual, not for this president, who does it repeatedly but for presidents of many years. I can't recall Barack Obama, who promised to be His Royal Transparency, ever giving much unscheduled press time like that, and if he did, it ended up being a lecture. That's, of course, the typical liberal approach to questions; answering something other than was asked and going on for a long time. Hillary Clinton raised that non-answer to an art form.

Donald Trump appears to answer questions of reporters as president exactly as he would have while a civilian businessman. Here's the answer, here is "what", here is "why." If he only has two minutes, he'll hang out for three, to take another question. At this stage of his presidency, he appears to have something to say about most all of what he is asked.

So what is different?

Well, I tend to think that it has to do with the sincerity of the answers, that they tend to reflect the actual beliefs of the man. President Trump answers X, Y and Z because he believes that the solution to the problem is X, Y and Z. He is not being deceptive; his real motivation is not some hidden agenda of money or power, but to solve the problems he was elected to solve with the solutions he said he was going to use.

Democrat leaders, on the other hand, are in a different position. Their "solutions" don't work, since liberalism doesn't work anywhere (and certainly not here). So their thirst for power is for power's sake, not to solve the problems -- otherwise, they would have actually addressed immigration, gun control and the like when they had the power, more, in fact, than the Republicans have now with their thin Senate margin. Instead, they went after health insurance in a way that didn't solve the health insurance problem but simply added a lot more government.

President Trump appears only motivated to address and solve problems; he is already wealthy and powerful. As I wrote recently, he has the businessman's approach that says to do it better, cheaper, faster. He will feel successful as president if he can accomplish things for our country and our people, not if like thinkers are elected to office just for power's sake.

And so it seems comfortable now for him to take questions informally and unscheduled, because he can speak sincerely about the issues and solutions. Since he is interested in the issue more than just power, he is open to having those solutions changed if the argument is there.

The left cannot do that -- they can speak to the press but not really answer questions, although the press is typically their ally and the questions are softballs. They seek power, not solutions; more government and more tenure, not a better life for the people of the USA.

President Trump said a lot of good things at CPAC. But the few minutes before leaving the White House, chatting with reporters, said equally as much, if we chose to listen.

I did.

Copyright 2018 by Robert Sutton

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

on upvote yes

He doesn't believe that people own their own bodies. He is a slave master. He want to decide what you put in or out of your body. he is a tyrant.

abortion, psychoactive plants. enough of this farce.

1 term only.

what break my back about him and his folly? when he said that it is great to assassinate plant traders. For me this is enough. we all know that if ivanka needed a plant for health reason she would have it.

as such he practice 2 tiers system. He pretend to be a monarch. He can fuck and rape children with epstein, however not ivanka. fuck him.

#1termonly

and ps you CAN NOT BE CHRISTIAN AND BELIEVE THAT PLANTS OF THE CREATION ARE ILLEGAL. this logic 101. all those saying the contrary are irrational, illogical things, only worth being to release nutrient at certain places for plants.

Can you please point out where and when the president actually said it was "ok to assassinate plant traders"? Can you give a reference to a reliable source? I have never heard any report, or seen anything written that remotely suggest he ever said, or would say, anything like that. Not only is is strange, but it doesn't sound consistent with anything else he has said, certainly not as president.

breaking news, most of the proteins are avaiable in plants... then it is just a question of refining it. Okay I may sucks at genetics, but in short dna > proteins > molecules... weed > a plant , hero > a plant, cocaine > a plant... find them, they are as old as the creation :).

Then it ask the question of fetanyl, again this a lie, there isn't one fetanil, because of the natural plants being illegal and for fun some research what is called designer drug, meaning that fetanyl can be 100x time stronger than hero, but still used for medical reason, while slightly moddified fetanyl can get to lethal does to a number so low that it can't be considered a drug when death is the only outcome, as so make it a poison and so making trump right in the sense that it can't be a "dealer" as the product will kill 100% of time with doses so low that skin contact with dust can be enough and as such justify that killing of those trading it and so making trump alleged statement reasonable. no I don't have reliable source, I wasn't there :).

Let me try again. What was Trump's statement that you have a problem with? I'm sorry, I have a biology degree from MIT but I cannot decode rambling sentences with 200 words. Please try again. I'm willing to listen.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

the earth is in the solar system. On earth grow Plantae. those living of the Earth can't be made illegal. What don't you understand in my statement?

For information the only thing you did in your cursus is repeat approved answers that you put in your tests. you made 0 discovery. you are like a parrot.

Then you don't understand fetanyl derivatives?

I have a problem with making plantae of the earth illegal. Those plantae are part of the Earth and are as valuable as an elephant or an ant.

Another example is grape. muslims don't drink alcohol but grow grapes. Do you understand?

Sweecee, it is not YOUR statement I don't understand, I get it, no earthly government can make God's plant kingdom illegal. I simply am trying to ask you to make a statement that starts with "President Trump is trying to pass a law that ..." so I know what it is you think he is trying to do.

Believe me, I am trying to work with you. I am simply not aware of what he is specifically doing that you oppose.

Loading...