So you think that if someone is pro liberty, they are not allowed to assist others in getting retribution from those that have broken a contract, if the state is involved? The state is the "adjudicating official" in the contract between this husband and wife, that was by their choosing. The PI is only assisting the victim gather evidence of wrong doing.

For all practical purposes marriages are honestly a three party contract between two people, and the state, and all parties involved agree to these contractual obligations.

The no true scottsman mentality is a shitty way to go about advocating for personal liberty. Wouldn't that hard line approach be technically less liberty minded since you reject all those that choose to enter into voluntary contrats with people or groups you disagree with?

I mean personally I see liberty as the freedom to choose to do whatever you want as long as all parties involved consent. How do you see it?

(Pardon typos or spelling issues typing from phone will edit once i get home)