Hello Steemians. One mistake new members and even some of those who have been here for sometime, make is not understanding some basic things about this program. And yet they complain a lot about not making any headway. What's your writing style like? How rich are your articles? Is your article such that when someone looks at it, the person would just hiss and wished he never opened it in the first place? Okay. You use to write more than 500 words. Fine. Nothing bad about writing 5000, okay. But how rich are such articles? In fact, what even make a rich article — what are the ingredients? These are some of the issues that I hope to address today so that you sit up and face this program the way it should.

Source

I got to know that most Steemians are at best gasbags when it comes to writing quality articles when I was still interested in becoming a seasoned @curie curator some months ago. Having scaled through the preliminary interviews, I was asked to submit 5 posts that meet the minimum conditions for Curation. For one good week, I was virtually everywhere: from photography to science, to philosophy, etc. yet I couldn't find even a single post. The ones I submitted were all rejected. This experience was an eyes opener for me as to why many people are not succeeding here.

A well written article distinguishes the author from the tons of trashes that are churned out every day in this program. It makes you stand out and easily locatable by veteran Steemians. It's not about writing everyday, but how rich are those articles? How formatted are your articles? Thousands of new people are joining steemit every blessed day, and things seem to be getting tougher by the day. Rich articles are one of the best marketing tools. Use them to your advantage!

Source

What makes articles rich

Catchy Title

Richness of an article starts from its title. The title of your article must command attention. It must speak directly to the readers on what the content of the article is all about. It should be such that when the reader scans through it, he should already grasp what the article is about.

Introduction

I had read a lot of works where Steemians just jumped straight and start developing the contextual body of their articles without an introduction. That's very wrong because the body of your work maybe too big for your readers to continue reading without having any slighted idea of where you are driving at. A good introduction should therefore introduce the topic to readers using easily comprehensible terms.

Contextual Body

The body if your article should demonstrate as well as illustrate the theme of your article. This is where examples and case studies are stated using words and terminologies that are very easy to understand. Graphs, drawings, diagrams and everything that relevant to the topic should be adopted here to buttress the facts in a way that is understandable to even a layman.

Conclusion

Here is where you compare all the facts and state what the future holds who the subject of the discourse. Your opinions on the subject matter is also welcome here.

Format your article to look neat

This is one of the problems people make in this program. They would hastily put up a badly formated works. When people see your work and it is not well organized and formatted, they would associate it with being unserious with what you do here. The least thing a whale, orca or top dolphin will do is curate a badly formatted article, unless it is an #introduceyourself post. Go now and learn the basic mark down if you haven't done so.

Source

The length is not the gist but it matters

I don't know why new members writes lots of tweets and expect people to upvote them. You are a new member. No one knows you. You have to work on your reputation; to get followers and attract positive attention to yourself. If someone like @surpassinggoogle writes 40-word tweets or even 10-word, people would see vote him because they know him to be capable of writing more than 2000 words. He's popular and has massive followers too. Even if he spits, people would vote. Unlike you who are just joining the program. Endeavor to develop your works to at least 500 words.

I hope you are able to gain one or two things from this piece today. Thanks.

Follow @eurogee, the Steemivangelist and the founder of @euronation Newbie's Support Team; follow @euronation

Newbie's Corner

Don't give up. Success is within reach only if you persevere

Starting out in any endeavor in life is always not easy. And so expecting otherwise is therefore an indirect expression of unreadiness in pursuit of any worthwhile goals. This has been the core definition of my person. So in any endeavor I find myself, I usually stayed back even when everyone has left to see if there would ever be a chance for success. Only when all indicators turn red that I would throw in the towel. I am grateful to God that I didn't give up in the face of initial challenges.

Are you finding it difficult to succeed here?

Maybe you are old or new here but you have been finding it difficult to make any headway. Is success what you crave for? Do you want to be taught about utopian.io opportunity and other worthwhile curation opportunities with special tags? Do you want to join a team with one spirit where the success of members is among the chief goals of its leadership? If that's your situation and you're ready to vote and be voted for, ready to be suspended or banned when you violate our rules, then use the below link to join Euronation Steemians Telegram Group...

https://t.me/joinchat/HsUnkBJ083m0R6xIp4iA-A

Don't Exit Without Voting For Witnesses!

No Witnesses = No Steem Blockchain; If You Truly Love Here, Vote For Witnesses NOW!

Click This Link To Vote Now

Witnesses are equivalent to life and blood of steem blockchain. Without them, the blockchain will seize to function and we will all be stranded here. Click here to read more on why it is important to vote for witnesses

---