RE: # @steem-ua: Announcements, Partnerships and Exciting News!

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

# @steem-ua: Announcements, Partnerships and Exciting News!

in ua •  6 years ago 

No, not really - 1.92, but with no posts in half a year.

Sorry to say, but you really have to earn total zero UA. That can't be the result of targeted punishment; it's mathematically impossible.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Then why so many ppl have zero UA score?

Well, in this context, as usual, simple numbers have deeper meaning behind.

Low UA means being followed by few accounts overall, or many low-UA accounts - that is, people who haven't built up a credible and genuine fanbase yet. (theoretically) Why someone missed on it so bad can have multiple reasons.

Your content doesn't seem to be particularly bad, so I'd assume your followers are low-profile members of Steem.

Or the algorithm hasn't calculated everyone's numbers yet.

UA is a nice try to augment the Steem ecosystem, but once the hype is over it will simply fall out of popularity.

Popularity may fade, delegations won't anytime soon.

And if delegations keep on providing value, the incentives will be there.

Posted using Partiko Android

Read the fine print, delegation conditions are subjected to change

True, but I wouldn't worry about it so much. It's not something would happen every day.

It just have to happen one day, and kaboom, down goes UA

Posted using Partiko Android

Well, also consider that many projects like this rely heavily on delegators. @dtube gets 97% of its SP via delegation. (77k self vs 2M delegated) For @steem-ua, this number is a staggering 99.85%. (530 SP is nothing) Close to 97% for @smartsteem. 87% for @trufflepig but that's a relatively small supporter.

And delegators are like investors: if the product creator acts against their will, they pull out.