Alright, perhaps we can start with why its ok to callously disregard the welfare of children by stating 'they knew the risks'?
If you arent prepared to gain the new facts there is little point in discussing our differences of opinion.
I will lead you to ideas that you have been intentionally kept from you, but its going to be up to you to do the reading.
For my part, i will be as concise as possible, but soundbites are not going to fully transmit 200 years of critical thinking purposely omitted from your indoctrination.
It has taken me decades to go from your position to mine, perhaps you can read and assimilate the ideas faster, but it will still take a dedicated effort on your part.
You dont yet know how wrong you are, i had some idea, that is why i sought the knowledge on my own.
I fully expect you to drop out, but the seeds will have been planted.
If your ideas have to be enforced by violence, your ideas suck, and so do you,...
I haven't crossed the line and started personally insulting you, that's that second time you've insulted me. Not a great way to begin a civilised discourse.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
So, you expect me to show respect to someone that:
A. Chose the state over the people.
B. Said that kids getting put into foster care was their own fault because they knew the risks.
C. Tried to pass some bs propaganda off on me like i dont know the difference between the indoctrination i got in skool and the real history behind anarchism and communism?
Please.
I offered to back up my claims with evidence, not debate petty etiquettes over who insulted whom first.
So, if you would like to defend your choice of rule by force over freedom, im listening.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit