A self-governing individual does not constrict or limit themselves in anarchy

For years I taught the basics about contracts and it's components.  I covered simple high level principles like how contracts require an offer, both parties then provide consideration and then proceed with the final acceptance.  I mainly focused on the consideration phase in regards to banks as most people don't realize that banks don't provide consideration in their contract agreements.

consideration: 6.  (law) anything regarded as recompense or equivalent for what one does or undertakes for another's benefit.  - Oxford Unabridged Dictionary 1958

In the system, the courts frown upon bullies who take advantage of the vulnerable.  You know, the bullies who try to get everything for nothing ... like banks.  Except the banks are protected by the government or perhaps in bed with them or some would suggested that the banks now own the government.  Either way, I'm not going to get into all of that today.  I'll save that for another post.  My concern with this tool runs into a very simple but often over looked issue.

 contract: 2. (law) an agreement enforceable by law - Oxford Unabridged Dictionary 1958

The concern I have is with the word 'enforceable'.  Why would we sign agreements when force is the underlying principle of the agreement?  Have we got to the point where we don't trust anybody anymore?  Are we so paranoid that we are willing to engage in violence at it's most covert?  We are telling others that I don't trust you so do as you agree or else I will bring violence upon you!  Some people think this is a long standing social way of doing contracts, but I suggest to you that this is an offspring of feudal governance.  

Many people who work with freedom issues believe that the relationship between us and the state is a matter of contract.  I rebuke this suggestion or idea.  When we make an oath of fealty to the Queen, it is a surrender, not a contract.  If it was a contract then the Queen would be bound to provide equal consideration and in fact she or any of her minions don't even sign anything, so how can it be a contract.  However, a feudal oath of fealty and surrender it definitely is!  

When we apply, register, vote, etc we are surrendering to be governed by somebody else.  It is her law that then dictates how we govern ourselves with one another.  One of those laws is Contract Law.  That is why they are enforceable by law, because we are deemed vulnerable and as such are not capable of self-governing.  If we were capable of self-governing we would not have surrendered to her in the first place.  The fact that violence and coercion is okay, even when we as individuals could not engage in such violence ourselves, tells me that this is a function of feudalism and NOT a custom of ours.  Our customs do not involve violence as it violates spiritual principles that govern this planet through natural law.

So when a self-governing individual leaves the system, what are they to do?  Do we enter into contracts and submit to this social perception of what contracts are all about?  

"But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God's throne: Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool:" ... Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black. But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.  Matthew 5:33-37

I've shared in the past that your signature is an attestation, which means an oath!  The pen is indeed mightier than the sword!  Monsters have used our ability to sign as a weapon against us for years.  We swear oaths all the time and don't even realize it.  When we swear an oath when dealing with the government, we are surrendering to his / her authority and jurisdiction through an oath of fealty, not contract!  I suggest that we are not to swear oaths at all but instead go back to a point where our word is good enough.  Our word is our reputation and if one has a poor reputation then people will not trust that individual.  He / she may have a hard time trading with people as a result.  

But if our word is impeccable, then our ability to acquire the things we need becomes much easier.  Does Steemit have such a device?  Sure, that is what our reputation scores are all about.  As our reputation builds within Steemit, so too does peoples trust in what we are saying.  New people to the platform have work to do to increase their reputation.  

Those who wear the masks of the state are sneaky and look for any way to get you to agree even without you being aware.  They use words as weapons, threats, intimidation and any other mode possible.  That is why I've told people 

Don't talk to the police!  

That is why I warned people that police is anybody with investigative powers for the Crown.  If somebody calls you on the phone, don't answer their questions, don't agree to the name or identify yourself in any way.  Tell them to put their concerns on paper and mail it.  Slow their game down.  Get it in writing so that a paper trail is now established.  They need to make that connection between the flesh and blood and their corporation to create that corporation sole.  Without that joinder, they are done.  Joinder happens in court, police encounters, CRA, WCB, CPS investigations, etc.  They need to prove that you are their subject and the connection is between you and their records as recorded on their rolls, which the courts are responsible for maintain the accuracy -- all rooted from the doomsday book of William the Conqueror in 1085.

http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/domesday/discover-domesday/

What is a doomsday book?  

doom:  to pronounce judgement or sentence upon, to condemn - Oxford Unabridged Dictionary 1958

doomsday: The judgement day. A day of final dissolution. - Oxford Unabridged Dictionary 1958

The book was a census of all people, land and animals.  Does that sound familiar?  It should, the census of today is the EXACT SAME THING!  It is a judgement, sentence and condemnation!  

I wrote a document to reflect what a new agreement would look like should we abandon the feudal system and start to work together peacefully.  It reads very differently than a modern legal contract.  You can read that agreement in my next post.  

https://steemit.com/ungrip/@wwf/spirit-centric-relationship-agreement

Caution:  If you are having a hard time following along with what I'm writing about, I suggest going through my blog to catch up on principles that have been covered in previous blogs.