Over the years, I've witnessed many people get themselves into trouble because they don't know how the state, debt collectors or others gain a food hold on our freedom.  It is our own ignorance and desire to be polite that they use to join us into agreements or contracts that then bind us to them, enforced by the violence of their laws.  

The good news is that we can fix our mistakes, but it does take a lot of work.  Did you know that if you are in their system, their contract laws stipulate that you have three days to cancel a contract.  It is called the cooling off period and is there to help us have a sober second look at the agreements that we enter into.  

But when these agreements are made face-to-face or over the phone, how do we know what the agent is saying or that we even entered into an agreement?  I've written about forked tongue language for years now, so how do we really know what they are saying?  We don't, unless we ask questions and educate ourselves.  Let me demonstrate what I mean by this.  

Scenario:  Some individual calls you up on the phone and asks if you are John Smith.  The name sounds like your name, but is it really you that they are looking for?  

Here is the problem:  Are they looking for the spiritual being in command of the flesh and blood vessel or are they looking for a corporation that just happens to have the same name?

Perhaps they are looking for JOHN SMITH, John SMITH or SMITH, John.  These are all different than 'John Smith', but sound the same when people speak them out loud.  They are desperate to get you to agree to be these corporations so that they can form a corporation sole upon which they can act upon.  They will resort to all kinds of pressure tactics and even threats to make joinder.   This happens with police, courts, CRA, CPS, WCB and all kinds of agencies!  

The problem we face is that these corporate names are all 'nom de guerre'!

nom de guerre:   an assumed name under which a person engages in combat or some other activity or enterprise. - Oxforddictionaries.com

If we use these names that THEY created, then we accept them and we are at war.  They need us at war and that is why they are desperate to connect us to their names.  When we confirm we are the name, we just bound the corporation to our vessel and created a corporation sole, which they can then act upon.  We can slow their game down so that we have time to think and ask the right questions to avoid such joinder.  I refuse to talk to anybody over the phone unless I know who it is and that individual is NOT an agent of the state.  So when ever ANYBODY calls, the first words out of my mouth is this:

Who is calling please?

If it is an agent of the state or other corporation and asking for a name and birthdate, then I respond:

I don't know who this is.  I don't answer questions over the phone.  Please put your concerns into writing and send it to me.  

I will then hang up the phone.  We have no idea who is on the other end of the phone, so why engage them?  Their job is to gain joinder so that they can have jurisdiction over us.  My job is to protect my freedoms.  I have no duty or obligation to speak to them over the phone.  If they put their concerns into writing, then it slows the game down, gives me time to think, research, ask the right questions or just send it all back due to a lack of jurisdiction.  

I've had people literally yelling and screaming at me when I do this.  Their abusive behaviour will not be tolerated.  If anything, it proves just how out of control they really are!  Peace is paramount in all my interactions with the state.  Without me testifying against myself, their job suddenly became ten times more difficult! 

I'm at the point in my life now where I know that they are doing this.  In 2008 when the Crown Prosecutor pointed to the ticket and asked if that was me, I told him:

that is not me!  

The judge threw out the case due to a lack of evidence and then stated that 'this is not a precedent setting case'.  They could not gain joinder and as such had no jurisdiction.

When I was confronted with the property inspector in 2007, he came right onto the land we steward.  My approach was to make sure I asked a lot of questions.  I asked him who he is, asked for id and also asked which sections of the Municipality Act he was working under.  When he told me, that gave me an opportunity to end the conversation as I wanted time to look up those sections.  I asked him if I could get back to him once I did my research.  He agreed and left.  I slowed his game down without giving him any permission to take pictures, do inspections, agreeing to be the 'person' he was looking for or anything like that.  The conversation was then continued using letters as I found out he violated the act.  As a result, I got a nice letter from the Minister and never heard from him again.  

In the end, the name makes no difference.  What makes the difference is our willingness to participate with their system.  I've seen government agents not capitalize the name to appease people like me, but the moment it goes into the system, the nom de guerre goes right back up.  They are not trust worthy, so don't trust them.  There are a few good apples who really do want to help, but remember that they are still agents of the state and have a duty to report.  They are the police and we have no duty to talk to them.  

They are trying to make their job easier and it is not my job to comply.  Their job should be ten times more difficult as the courts have constantly stated that it is better to let 10 guilty people go free than one innocent be jailed.  The burden is on them, not us.  They wanted that job, so demand that they do it properly!  

The people are the ones that provide the checks and balances with the state.  The people have reneged on their duty and as such we have tyranny unfolding all over the world.  If you want the benefits and privileges of the state, then it is your duty to ensure they don't exceed their authority.  That takes a lot of work and sadly not many are willing to do that work.  

The choice is always in the hands of the individual.