I've read all of them. I don't deny violence by government forces. I just also know my government was funding the "moderate rebels" that was just Al Qeada in Syria. Western media also used Twitter accounts of the Aleppo situation that were traced back to Al Nusra supporters. Western media also used the "White Helmets" propaganda to sell Americans on US involved in Syria.

Do you support the unguided bombing of US forced in Raqqa or the killings of pro-government civilians? I don't think so.

Selling Assad as the next butcher of the Middle East doesn't fly the way it used to. Since Americans know they are sold lies on a daily basis to get them to sign off on the next intervention.

Syria is s complex situation, that has had geopolitical actors involved for about a decade.

Reading the side of the story from the view of the population supportive of the Assad government is new to most Western readers.

In terms of the chemical attack, it has continued to be disputed. Seymour Hersh continues to do great research on getting to the truth of what was used. We already both admit that it wasn't Sarin as the Western media told us in about 20 minutes after the attack took place.

There is war propaganda on both sides.