Doesn't that means centralizing the blockchain?
RE: Prevent Abuse of Steem Reward Pool
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Prevent Abuse of Steem Reward Pool
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
It is a necessary evil. In any way, witnesses are performing the function of leading the community. In fact, many a witness have come from among the community heroes. If they can shoulder an additional responsibility, the whole blockchain could benefit.
An important point to consider here would be that many of them are doing some of these functions already. Designating them would fix responsibility and get things done.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It wouldn't necessarily mean it's centralized. It'd just be a distributed Democratic Republic.
Having a governance structure does not mean centralization.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit