Problem
I friend of mine recently wanted the create a steemit account but was denied with the following error message:
We don't know if this is because of a previous attempt to create an account or because someone with that similar phone number made a registration request. Either way: I can see several problems with phone numbers as registration requirement.
- Phone numbers are not a live long property. You can loose a phone number by getting a new contract with a different company. Especially if you move to another country. The number can also be assigned to a new user which then won't be able to register.
- People might make a typo when trying to register. Unlike a typo in an e-Mail the mistyped number will most likely still be a valid phone number. If the true owner of that number wants to register he or she will be denied service.
- Speaking of denied service: a malicious person could start and abandon a registration with someone else phone number in a deny of service attack. This is also valid for E-Mails.
Proposal
Adding a requirement for phone numbers, and in lesser degree EMail, without a recovery process seems to be a mayor design flaw top me. I suggest that the follwowing two features are added to the system:
- Registrations expiry: a registration attempt should expire after a short while freeing the number and Email for a new user.
- Number and eMail contest and recovery: A user should be able to contest the use of an eMail or phone number by another user as false.
Both options should be placed at an easy to find location in the GUI as they are mostly needed by new users which can't be expected to know there way around the system
Benefits
More news users make it though the registration process. Less fraught.
Posted on Utopian.io - Rewarding Open Source Contributors
Your contribution cannot be approved because it is not as informative as other contributions. See the Utopian Rules.
Contributions need to be informative and descriptive in order to help readers and developers understand them.
The rule clearly stated that the length of the body of the contribution should be enough to give every possible detail about the submitted contribution. Thank you.
You can contact us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This description is more detailed then any software developer worth his her salt would ever need.
One can argue that it's really a bug in steemit/faucet and not a feature request for steemit/condenser and reject on that basis. And indeed it has been reported as a bug User phone number held in the system even when unconfirmed.
Notice the difference between between the bug report form Jolly-Pirate and mine. I have put 5 times the effort in to a normal bug (Jolly-Pirates is a normal bug report) and you still reject?
OK, let's not be hasty. Let's have a look at the normal utopian.io steemit/condenser postings to compare where I went wrong.
The first 5 postings approved are:
Now I see. Those postings are all about “promotion” and “awareness”
Utopian.io isn't about software development at all. You are not actually interested in technical postings describing real problems or real improvements. You are just some form of promo channel. How disappointing.
All I can say then: Sorry I bothered you.
PS: Of course I will remove my witness vote. I won't vote for a promo channel.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit