Death statistics from the flu are extremely exaggerated.
"According to the National Vital Statistics System in the U.S., for example, annual flu deaths in 2010 amounted to just 500 per year -- fewer than deaths from ulcers (2,977), hernias (1,832) and pregnancy and childbirth (825), and a far cry from the big killers such as heart disease (597,689) and cancers (574,743). The story is similar in Canada, where unlikely killers likewise dwarf Statistics Canada's count of flu deaths.
Even that 500 figure for the U.S. could be too high, according to analyses in authoritative journals such as the American Journal of Public Health and the British Medical Journal. Only about 15-20 per cent of people who come down with flu-like symptoms have the influenza virus -- the other 80-85 per cent actually caught rhinovirus or other germs that are indistinguishable from the true flu without laboratory tests, which are rarely done. In 2001, a year in which death certificates listed 257 Americans as having died of flu, only 18 were positively identified as true flus. The other 239 were simply assumed to be flus and most likely had few true flus among them."
http://m.huffingtonpost.ca/lawrence-solomon/death-by-influenza_b_4661442.html
Very interesting....from what I understand one can only get the flu every 5 or so years.
Thank you for your informative response, it is truly appreciated
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Another thing about the flu is that it rapidly mutants. So the vaccines are highly ineffective since the strain they developed the vaccine for has already changed by the time they are admistering the shots.
No problem, anytime :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit