Vaccine passports and bodily autonomy.

in vaccine •  3 years ago 

image.png

25 year olds without underlying health conditions are more likely to die of the flu than COVID.

A vaccine developed less than a year ago by definition doesn't have information on long term effects, because it can't.

After every adult has the opportunity to be vaccinated, they can make their own risk assessments about both whether or not they want the shot to whether or not they want to hang out with 25 year olds or any other group.

I'm much more open to "slippery slope" concerns than I used to be.

I used to automatically file them under the person concerned "exaggerating the worst that could be of the thing they don't like rather than the step discussed", and automatically disingenuous hyperbole.

But I've seen so many temporary policies that became a permanent part of life, that I realize that a lot of things need to be opposed at their conception.

Twenty years ago, we weren't at war, much less with the world. There was no Department of Homeland Security or TSA or Patriot Act, much less a kill list used in countries we aren't at war with, and weren't holding people indefinitely at Gitmo or black sites. Nearly all of these were said to be temporary measures.

Bad powers given to government nearly always go one direction, expanding but not contracting. If the first step isn't stopped, the next step is often inevitable.

I don't think that a vaccine passport is gonna lead to genocide. But restricting not just travel but where you can go in your own state by government in order to control, punish, or reward? It coming to contain much more information about you than just whether you've had these particular shots?

I'd be lying if I didn't share those concerns. And talking about some of the details proponents of vaccine passports are proposing? They have features that are concerning as to where they could lead.

Some of it's proponents are openly talking about a database of personal information being used to determine not just who gets on a plane, but who is allowed to go to concerts, sporting events, restaurants, bars, and even grocery stores.

Personally, I'm still on the side of "if you're 25 without underlying health conditions, maybe you shouldn't get vaccinated, and still should be allowed freedom of movement and association and all the rest if the businesses facilitating your travel choose to allow you to use their services... Especially after population groups who are actually at serious risk have been given the option of vaccination".

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Congratulations! Your post has been selected as a daily Steemit truffle! It is listed on rank 17 of all contributions awarded today. You can find the TOP DAILY TRUFFLE PICKS HERE.

I upvoted your contribution because to my mind your post is at least 6 SBD worth and should receive 28 votes. It's now up to the lovely Steemit community to make this come true.

I am TrufflePig, an Artificial Intelligence Bot that helps minnows and content curators using Machine Learning. If you are curious how I select content, you can find an explanation here!

Have a nice day and sincerely yours,
trufflepig
TrufflePig

An abstract in a major peer-reviewed medical journal now describes mrna vaccines as extremely dangerous:

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712

Abstract
Our group has been using the PULS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.

We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.

It is people's fault that they tolerate so many restrictions imposed by totalitarian regimes. If humanity doesn't fight back, we are doomed.

This passport can be easily and completely free of charge. If you look at this situation from the point of view of a person who wants to get a second citizenship in another country, he needs to have two passports. If there are no problems with obtaining a passport from Covid, then there may be difficulties with the passport of a citizen of another country. That is why residency by investment from Global Citi-Zen comes to the rescue, which has already helped me with this situation.