I was referring to the conventional treatments to cancer which have been shown to cause cancers and haven't been shown to be effective by any means to stop cancer. Chemotherapy has an effective rate of less than 3%. If you read the literature on why people die, it will be evident that they succumb to the treatment before they do to the cancer, and the treatment promotes cancer through weakened system and stress, while surgeries carry the risk of spreading cancer cells throughout the blood and body. Radiation therapy has been shown to cause cancer as well.
So when you said you're familiar with the limitation of treating cancer through alternative medicine, I asked as opposed to the lack of limitation to treatment under conventional means?
I believe it was quite clear: the limitations of naturopathy. Sometimes we have to face the fact that diseases will kill us. Period. Nothing more to do about it. Naturopathy does not work miracles. It never did, otherwise people in the middle ages would have lived to 150.
Sorry for the bad news. I'm not into argument for argument's sake. So, so long and have nice life.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit