lol you still can't tell the difference between fact and opinion

Actually I raised the question, can you demonstrate that it's an opinion, you have asked me the question again, and I said that you cannot determine if its opinion from the statement itself, and that is still true regardless of your nonsense ridicule, which again doesn't have any reason or logic behind it, you can claim it's an opinion but you cannot demonstrate it.

The other issue is that you will likely need to end up getting the disease if you rely on naturally acquired immunity.

You're not making sense here, even if it did, you still have to provide facts to back up your argument, and implying that vaccines will provide better immunity than natural immunity by itself won't make it true.

Natural immunity isn't immune to diminishing, and likewise, vaccine-induced immunity can sometimes be lifelong. Both produce active immunity.

The fact is that you argued vaccination protects people that cannot get vaccines, when people that are vaccinated actively shed the disease and the disease is one of the side effects of vaccines.

You seem to forget that when vaccination was at its height, measles was considered to have been eliminated from the United States.

What was the HIGH at? Do you have research that confirms these claims?

Again, come again.