RE: Vaccines Increase Your Chances of Catching Infectious Disease - Study Reveals!

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Vaccines Increase Your Chances of Catching Infectious Disease - Study Reveals!

in vaccines •  7 years ago  (edited)

Do antibodies determine immunity?
Do infants produce antibodies?

I was wondering
Are there any scientific studies in infants, children or adults to help us understand the nature of the progression of TH1, TH2 and TH3 immune responses to any of the injected materials in vaccines?

What about Children who are congenitally unable to produce antibodies (agammaglobulinaemia) they are able to recover from illness and demonstrate long-lasting immunity to disease?

Does that have something do so with the cell mediated immune response which appears all important in viral infections ?

Are Antibodies or immunoglobulins effective against viruses, which can ‘hide’ within the cells of the body?

A UK study showed that individuals with high diphtheria titres were as likely to develop symptoms as individuals with low or zero titres. Others in contact with the disease such as nurses also were shown to have little or no antibodies to diphtheria but remained disease-free. In addition, some of those who recovered did not demonstrate any antibodies, but exhibited immunity upon re-exposure.

A study into measles also demonstrated immunity to be present in those with no detectable level of antibodies and an absence of protection from the disease in those with high levels of measles antibodies.

Here is an example

Scientists from HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL, M.I.T., massachusetts general, san raffaele institute (Italy), and other institutes, co-authored and published on how they removed all antibodies from mice, leaving only B-Cells, which successfully fought off lethal viruses. This debunks vaccine manufacturers who say that vaccines are necessary to convey immunity. This
suggests that repeated vaccinations could be the reason why some vaccinated people lose their natural immunities, as their body tends to unnaturally rely on temporary, antibody-based immunities.
Immunity 2012 Mar 23; 36(3): 415-426:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3359130/pdf/nihms-377739.pdf

Science and their assumptions,
the presence of antibodies in a person means is that the person has come into contact with a particular pathogen, does this mean that they have immunity?

There is so much evidence including the continued outbreaks of disease amongst immunized groups, has led various mainstream scientists to seriously question the current understanding about what constitutes reliable immunity.

Measles Shedding is real

For now it's booster time
And shedding is real !

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

You're doing a great job, thank you!

As a disclaimer! @truthtrain

My research is not conclusive and is subject to correction from any source. I accept all correction and advice that any fellow steemian would like to pass on.

did you make sense?