If you that that was brilliant, you should watch this rebuttal.
I never thought I'd say this, but Larken gets taught a lesson in philosophy here.
Larken is using semantic jiujitsu and sophistry, all while avoiding the core philosophy of veganism (freedom for sentient beings. Wait a minute, that sounds like....anarchy) and never actually stating whether or not he thinks it is morally justified to kill animals for taste pleasure.
Excellent response! I love Larken but even he can't grasp it all, can he? I feel sorry for his bad fail on this one because I'm pretty sure he'll get there sooner or later and will understand the issue the depth.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit