Hmmm that's a really cool perspective. In my mind, it creates an implication that - if things don't have value, but can still be valued, it means the individual is the one with value, and they choose to give it out on a case by case basis. That's pretty awesome.
RE: Private and Personal Property: A Distinction Without a Difference
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Private and Personal Property: A Distinction Without a Difference