But with every bidbot transaction, the community's dependence on them increases, and the one's willing to do this to us gain more influence over the network. We are forging oligarchs here, and look what happened when we allowed that in the world.
This is the simple way I look at it. Before bidbots, the STEEM was getting distributed across the network. Upon the inception of bidbots, The distribution of STEEM on the network was reversed, and is now being concentrated at a ridiculous rate into the hands of a few.
They advertised this place as a way to earn money by posting content, not as a place where you can pay to be given money.
Good to see you with your pussy out this time by the way.
I'm a cat person - I like dogs but relate to cats. Our cat looks after number one - he would always upvote himself first - I was just looking at an account that has been here since Aug 2016 like me, has done twice as many posts, has nearly three times the followers, but has bugger all in the wallet.
If kiwideb and I have nearly NZ$50 000 invested in Steemit would we not be crazy to not make as much as we can from that?
It's only from having voting power that we exert any influence on content, and more voting power is always handy.
Hell if it was any other crypto I'm out to make as much as possible while the opportunity is here.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit