RE: Thank you!! @movingman Water has a Danged Memory!!

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Thank you!! @movingman Water has a Danged Memory!!

in water •  7 years ago  (edited)

Unfortunately, there are no 3D model representations that posit a flat earth with a lunar eclipse without things such as an INSANELY HUGE, yet invisible object that despite being invisible, creates the shadow/eclipse of the moon.

To argue that a conspiracy that spans millennia and has absolutely not one discernable objective for the perpetrators of the conspiracy, let alone advantage and to relate it to other conspiracies that both have numerous motives and plenty of evidence from whistleblowers while the enormity of the flat earth conspiracy has no such thing and we are to believe it's been much more successful than these lesser and more regionally limited conspiracies is to fly in the face of all that is reasonable and logical, especially considering the numerous collaborations that would be required in countless fields, the enormity of which would require almost every single professional in the world to be in on it.

To put it even more plainly, the fact that you can observe the spinning globe A: the moon, and the other spinning globe B: the sun with any store-bought telescope and filters and you can predict with utmost precision things such as solar eclipses and lunar eclipses as have countless civilizations, all based on a heliocentric model, would mean that the conspiracy is so grand that forces out there in the universe are literally toying with our perceptions for absolutely no discernable reason IN tandem with an insurmountable conspiracy that spans countless cultures and millenia amidst our own people, for there is no other explanation for those things.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I do not assume that all of the history that has been taught to me is accurate. Therefore I can not assume that I know exactly what has been known for millenia. Judging by the history I’ve been alive for, things are constantly remixed by the authors.

I also can’t assume I know all possible reasons others have for their actions. Many more possibilities exist than any one mans imagination in my opinion.

Spiritual deception is very common from what I’ve seen, televangelists come to mind, psychics, tarot cards, palm reading, pedophile churches.

But the basic physics that we experience are a better argument than vague broad topics.

Does the spin of the earth affect airplanes?

Tell me, if you're inside of a car traveling 60 mph and you throw a ball in the air inside the car, what happens? Does the motion of the car affect the ball? Equally, when I posted the link and you ignored it, the spin of the earth, if it was 1 mph or 50000000000 mph, will affect the planes, except that not in the way you think "basic" physics work and you think it affects them.

Also, instead of "broad topics" that are not helped at all by a flat earth or a cube earth, or a earth dome under the ocean on a flat plane sitting on infinitely tall pillars or floating on the back of a tortoise, I content that there is absolutely not one instance that you can detail where the perpetrators of such a large conspiracy which despite the lack of even ONE individual coming out to detail anything about it (unlike almost every other conspiracy where the perpetrators are known and their motives obvious and whistleblowers have come forward) could be advantaged by this "secret" knowledge. Read that again, not one instance, it is so irrelevant that the only relevance of this conspiracy is actually in the numerous professions that RELY on their work and life on a precise, utmost precise, model of our world, which you believe they all work in tandem to keep this secret so secret that it befuddles anyone with a modicum of common sense, something that you obviously consider almost faux pas, yet you ask things that defy common sense like "will the spin of the earth affect airplanes". I provided an experiment that demonstrates the spin of the earth by its effect on light and a link to common sense explanation that didn't stop you from ignoring it outright and asking the same redundant question.

Stick to logic, no need to make assertions about me.

I decide what is necessary and what isn't, and despite what you obviously didn't think it necessary to address, I want to know why you ignored the link that detailed the answer to your question or the analogy I offered for the car and the ball.

You assert that the conspiracy can help all these different causes but you didn't offer one simple detail on why and how and expect your vacuous assertions to stand by themselves, is that because you have a disdain for common sense, or is it because you'd assert a large insurmountable conspiracy and speak about non-existent or outright bogus theoretical models that even a child would deduce to be utterly flawed as if they hold any credence and offered absolutely no source to validate such credence yet want to make assertions to their credence in the same way you make assertions as to the purpose of such a grand, no, giant conspiracy?

You seem to be lacking the ability to have a logical discussion without trying to make things personal.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

Sorry I am not the one that dismissed a simple logical example as "makes no logical sense", you must have me mistaken for someone that claims they have been looking for the curve and when offered the required vantage to observe such a curve with the naked eye and the immense distances required they dismissed it off hand as if it was simply about seeing the curve from an airplane, and equally when presented with an experiment that demonstrates the spin of the earth with light they didn't bother to look at it even.

The main things that I’ve gotten out of this exchange are that you believe the version of history you’ve heard is absolutely correct, you believe your imagination covers all possibilities, & that you can provide links to standard explanations that lack logical sense, despite your faith in them. There is nothing in these responses of value for me & I don’t believe you are open minded enough for me to spend my time continuing to read your attempted insults.

If you want to insult strangers, do it in the real world where you can expirement with real physics & have some fun 😃

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

The insult is telling me that I lack the "ability" to have a "logical discussion" and accusing me of making things "personal", and to knock this nail home, it doesn't matter what "insults" you construct, it's entirely your choice to make nonsense assertions and drop the conversation after I had spent my time explaining things in a cogent wa.y. You heard the one about the onus of proof is on the claimant? You claimed much but it was all left as baseless assertions, in fact I could probably list 20 of them, lets see how good I am with estimating them:

  • Above you spoke of my beliefs of "history I have heard being absolutely correct" but you have no right to speak of my beliefs when I didn't utter the word once and I never posited what you claimed once
  • You claimed that I spoke of my belief again, this time that my "imagination covering all possibilities" but again I never once uttered such nonsense and not once insinuated such
  • You claim the links I provided lack logical sense yet you didn't offer any proof or explanations to it that made sense and when I offered the Coriolis effect you went quiet and instead directed your efforts at this trite remark about me and my beliefs.
  • That the links I provided requires Faith, nothing to substantiate that baseless assertion was offered though.
  • That I insulted you, or "attempted" to insult you, yet there's zero substance to back this assertion up.
  • That I made things personal, just above that and on top of that you claimed that "I seem to be lacking the ability to not TRY to make things personal when having a logical discussion", the insinuating nonsense was both Personal and lacked logical consistency since one can hurl insults AND make perfect, reasonable sense, or you seem to imply that the two are exclusive to one another.
  • You insinuated that I didn't "stick to logic" by demanding that I "Stick to logic", again insinuating that as previously, because I make "assertions" about you I am not sticking to logic, as if logic and "assertions about you" are mutually exclusive.
    *You asserted that the most obvious advantage for this conspiracy is economic reasons but you didn't bother to offer any kind of reasoning or details as to how and why that is and left it as another baseless assertion.
  • You asserted that the link I posted makes no logical sense, yet you didn't bother to point to the obvious flaw in logic, and left it as a vacuous assertion.
  • You went on to errenously describe, the equivalent of a Ball being thrown in the air inside the car as being affected by the speed of the car, as if it was outside the car.
  • You went to erroneously consider that same scenario, as being outside the atmosphere and outside the earth, instead of sticking to the logical consistency/cogent scenario of an airplane (the ball) being inside the atmosphere and moving with it and in it (the car) by remarking that the speed of the car affects the inside of the car as if the velocity can be negated by throwing the ball to the back of the car (flying against the 1000mph atmosphere)
  • You went to assert that planes make no logical sense on a ball, yet they make perfect sense on a Static Plane, disregarding the simple common sense logic of the example and asserting your nonsense.
  • You've yet to bring forth any contentions to the Coriolis Effect
  • You've yet to delive the theoretical models that posit a lunar eclipse
  • You've yet to detail one simple scenario where the perpetrators of this Giant Conspiracy are advantaged by it.
  • You've tried to obfuscate or outright lie that you weren't interested in the curve from airplanes without detailing or explaining why such a detail is relevant
  • You've yet to address the experiment that demonstrates the motion of the earth with fiber optics
  • You've tried to tie in this ennormous undertaking of a conspiracy with other conspiracies, in effect saying that you don't trust ANY and ALL proffesionals from the hundreds of nations across the globe.
  • You've had nothing to say to the fact that we have PETABITES of data from the universe around us, and all of it is not only consistent, it's so consistent that there is yet to be any discreptancy, despite the fact that faking topography or imagery is impossible on many of the moons which are photographed at different light incidences.
  • You've claimed that you have been looking for the spin and curve of the earth for some time yet you've not ran over any of the numerous thigns I have posited and presented but you did attempt to marginalize my comments not once, not twice but three times, first by obsfucating that you weren't looking for the curve from an airplane as if that invalidates looking for the curve, that because I made assertions about you (which were based only on what you said and presented) you needent respond to my comment, and lastly these trite remarks on me devoid of any substance.

Tell me some more about these theoretical models that you have yet to present which make much more sense to you and explain simple things like the horizon. Do I need to draw you a representation of the lack of horizon on a flat plane?