RE: Witness consensus status to fix the actual steem’s economic flows (ENG)

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Witness consensus status to fix the actual steem’s economic flows (ENG)

in witness-category •  6 years ago 

Its looking more and more like the farther we get from the original design the worse things get.
Have we jumped the shark?

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Mistakes were made, but I think they are fixable. My belief is that most of the changes required aren't that difficult.

Then why the obstinancy at the top?
No changes until after smt's?

We should already have downvotes separate from rep harming flags.
This change isnt even mentioned anymore because of the futility.

Personally, i dont like betting the farm on promises that a new token will fix our broken coin.
How does issuing new fiat tokens backed by a broken fiat coin fix anything?
The folks are unlikely to be convinced, imo.

If we had let the whale experiment play out, likely we would have a middle class, excited new users, and could look at raising the soft cap on voting.
Having avoided rewarding those with dumping immediately as their goal for nearly two years, and counting.

I hope this new peristroika from the top leads to something changing sooner rather than later.