RE: Witness consensus status to fix the actual steem’s economic flows (ENG)

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Witness consensus status to fix the actual steem’s economic flows (ENG)

in witness-category •  6 years ago 

Agreed. If more people move to curation for the rewards then it's feasible more people will move to curation bots. There are a lot of people in financially struggling areas posting multiple times a day, trying to scrape some rewards together. It's feasible to consider a good portion of them will instead curate content for rewards and, hopefully, hook up with SP holders to help curate for them. Maybe tools like https://wise.vote/ will help as well. I did an interview with Noisy a while back about Wise. More tools like that could bring the perfect balance of human automation and incentive / reward sharing.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  
  ·  6 years ago (edited)

Was not aware of wise but think you for pointing out it. That looks great and there can be all sorts of tools for different curation models including delegation, collaboration, and human-machine hybrids. Excellent points.