Steem Consensus Witness Statement : Hardfork 0.23 (Codename: New Steem)

in witness-category •  4 years ago 

Dear Steemians,

Many things have happened since February, and we believe that this is time to wrap up and move on. The Steem blockchain has been under constant attack from malicious accounts and this has heavily influenced user experience, Dapps useability, and the stability of the chain itself.


Note that 22.8888 was previously implemented as a temporary, reversible measure to resolve issues.

Unlike 22.2 (where now-hive witnesses froze Steem Inc. related accounts (total amount 65M SP, worth about 13 million USD) without any public discussion or notice), 22.8888 was different in two ways:

(1) pre-announcement was made so that community had time to discuss and affected accounts could make changes (for example, powerdown routes), and

(2) the reasons were based on what actually happened ("HIVE" chain split), while for 22.2 the reasons were based on something that did not happen (it was mere speculation like "it may happen" or "it is likely to happen", argued by some 22.2 witnesses)


Since 22.8888, we have observed even more negative actions, including (but not limited to)

(1) Intentionally undermining network stability by running different versions of the witness nodes and/or spamming malicious transactions (note that this can be solved by Hardfork as these transactions will now be ignored)

(2) Spamming meaningless or hostile post/replies, to displease Steem users and render the ecosystem unattractive for the existing user base and all potential new users, PO, and investors,

(3) Negatively and severely affecting the ecosystem by siphoning the rewards pool and using bots to automate the farm-and-dump on the chain without any care given to the PoB concept. The purpose of these malicious activities was to push users away from Steem by allocating part of the reward pool to their farming circles in the aim to highly lower the rewards that genuine authors are getting, engaging in heavy farming by recycling and posting stolen content to damage the SEO advantage that the community has built during the past 4 years, in addition to putting huge selling pressure on STEEM to keep people away from it by continuously dumping all the STEEM generated by the farming,

(4) Spreading FUD, rumors, and targeted disinformation, along with attacking, doxing, and publicly shaming users with different opinions.

Thus, witnesses have decided to make changes with HF to protect Steem network stability, enhance Steem user experience, and protect Steem community users' property rights. In particular, we expect Steem users may enjoy faster, more stable Steem blockchain as the issues of (1) will not be relevant.


We notify that there will be three changes:

I. Power-down period will be reduced to 4 weeks, instead of the current 13 weeks. This change is to promote more users to stake STEEM without fearing their assets locked up for a long period and to participate in Steem activities. By creating a more friendly environment for investors, we expect this change to positively enhance STEEM stakeholders' experience.

II. Update the documentation and other key related materials necessary to secure Steem, gain network stability, honor user experience, and ensure the proper functioning of the chain and projects that are built on top of if by providing accurate and up-to-date data.

III. Seize some user accounts that participated in criminal activities by actively contributing to the threat against the Steem blockchain and/or to the theft of STEEM holders' assets.

  1. The launch of HIVE chain is not a protocol update to improve blockchain performance or security, but a hostile split action to exclude certain accounts.
  2. Some of the previous main Steem witnesses (now most of them are HIVE main witnesses) put Steem blockchain at risk by threatening the stability of the Steem Blockchain while running a hostile Hardfork version on Steem, even though their main job as main witnesses was to protect and maintain the integrity of the Steem Blockchain. See Steem Consensus Witness Statement: Softfork 0.22.8888 for more details.
  3. Some HIVE launching members decided to take away HIVE tokens of 326 Steem users' HIVE tokens and placed it in the @steem.dao account (total amount of 83.2 million STEEM, about 23% of the total STEEM supply that worth around 16.6 million USD, as of 20th May 2020) that is de facto controlled by a small group. This is a clear violation of the property rights of STEEM holders, as these HIVE members illegally transferred assets of the Steem users that were assigned at the time of snapshot (code-copy chain split time). One may find these transfer records on Hiveblocks or Hiveblockexplorer, for example, one sample screenshot is provided below:

image.png

Ironically, the very reason that HIVE witnesses got their spots at the HIVE launch was the result of STEEM token holders' voting. And it is even more disturbing that many Steem users who got their assets stolen actually had voted for more than 5 HIVE witnesses (then Steem main witnesses), but these HIVE witnesses betrayed STEEM holders who voted for them.

Note that some HIVE witnesses use the misleading word "airdrop", but it is a mere copy-chain so "snapshot" is the proper one. If a chain is to start from scratch, "airdrop" is a proper term and the chain designers may choose whatever airdrop method. However, the HIVE case is a clear copy - HIVE copied everything of Steem blockchain, such as account names, passwords, previous postings, assets, etc. What they have done is taking other users' assets after the snapshot.

  • Also note that some HIVE users use another misleading concept like “there was no HIVE before the split, so no HIVE can be taken away from Steem users.” This is categorically inaccurate and misleading - how can you transfer something that does not exist? Their blockchain record clearly shows that HIVE, HBD, and Hive Power were transferred.

Hardfork Data:

  1. Date: 20th May 2020
  2. Time: 14:00 UTC
  3. Github Code: https://github.com/steemhardfork/steemhf/tree/hf0.23

However, witnesses understand that some Steem community members may have different views regarding specifics. We reiterate that witnesses respect the importance of the Steem community, encourage Steem community discussion sessions, and fully support Steem community decisions.

Proposals may be made via SPS so that any Steem community members may suggest potential exclusion of certain accounts that were affected by the HF.

More details will be posted soon.

Steem on.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

like done before on Hive with steem.dao where my SP seems to be in also !!!

So where is the difference, the "old Gang" on Hive does it first and now wondering why they earn back the same from JS this is paying penalties for the first case from your side.

I´m not happy with a few of the people on the list but hey the all have a chance to talk to JS about, or better send in a proposal and pray that anybody will help them.

Remember the same was happening to many of us with Hive, and imagine what chance this proposal had when acting against the stake from the "old Gang"

It´s all about a few accounts who demand what´s happening on the Hive-chain !

False equivalence doesn't hold water.

Who exactly are you?
steemit inc?
a group of witnesses?

  ·  4 years ago (edited)

Here are witnesses on record as respecting the sanctity of private property:

TripleA team (includes the current witnesses @triple.aaa, @jayplay.witness, @the707, @skuld2000.wit, @segye.witness
@steemhunt
@zzan.witnesses
@steem-dragon
@hinomaru-jp
@future.witness

If they run this hardfork then consider their word unreliable.

There are many misdeeds alleged of varying severity and a group of accounts who are being punished equally via funds forfeiture. Even if these wallet holders are guilty, one-size-fits-all punishment is not the way just leaders behave.







































This reads like the propaganda of a state actor.

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

Some top20 witnesses are not running the new hf version yet. They better hurry, otherwise they will be kicked out by the powers in charge.

Justin Sun can copy code and buyout existing companies but he can never force free people to become his slaves.

贾斯汀·孙(Justin Sun)可以复制代码并收购现有公司,但他永远不能强迫自由的人成为他的奴隶。

저스틴 선 (Justin Sun)은 코드를 복사하고 기존 회사를 매입 할 수는 있지만 자유인을 강제로 노예로 만들 수 없습니다.

Justin Sunはコードをコピーして既存の企業を買収することができますが、自由な人々に彼の奴隷になることを強制することはできません。

I got an alert that the HF will remove steem from accounts when I logged on. People are going to leave this place like flies. if they lose their hard-earned Steem.

A blockchain that can and does seize funds is a worthless blockchain. The good news is the reduction of the power down time.

So, i now can confirm that the power down period still 13 week, so it was a lie, the sole intention of this fork was to remove some users tokens...

I's very good that Power-down period will be reduced to 4 weeks. I think it is absolutely the number one priority.

However, witnesses understand that some Steem community members may have different views regarding specifics. We reiterate that witnesses respect the importance of the Steem community, encourage Steem community discussion sessions, and fully support Steem community decisions

No. You really don't. The last fork was/is extremely unpopular. This one will be even more unpopular. Your actions have hurt the Steem community greatly causing the exodus of many apps and many members. You are doing this for your own selfish reasons because when you look at your actions, it is apparent that you are the exact same as the old witnesses. You should admit that and move on.

Nah you are just bitches













































































Funny... The power down period is still 13 week... I guess this hard fork had another porpoise...

Nope, its 4 weeks. I think you have to stop powerdown, and start again.

I did, still giving me 38 steem per week from my 490 SP...

It's just a guess but perhaps the power downs that were in place during the hf will have to stick to 13weeks. I canceled mine yesterday and started it again after the hf and I got 4 weeks. Hopefully someone more knowledgeable will jump in and explain it properly. Again, it's just me guessing.

I also cancelled mine and started a new one, its now 4 weeks... The thing is that still shows as 13 weeks when you try to select the amount of SP to power down, its just a pretty poor job on coding i guess...

Poor coding? On Steemit? Perish the thought! [/sarcasm]

Anything beyond copy and paste seems too complicated :)

Loading...

And here I thought things would go back to normal. Both Chains go their own way.

But no, both chains continue withholding funds from their users.

Withholding funds is wrong. It was wrong in HF 22.2, it was wrong when forking the Hive chain and is wrong in HF 23.

Two wrongs don't make a right. Neither does Three!

download1.jpg

Withholding funds sends a signal to the investors that their funds aren't save and can to taken away by the witnesses at any moment.

Steem (and to a lesser degree Hive) are currently showing me that my funds are not save and are only one hard fork away from been seized.

In the past all I have to fear when criticising a whiteness was a downvote. Now I have to fear that my funds are seized at the next hard fork.

The only good news is the faster power down giving me a change to get out of here ASAP.

Screenshot_2020-05-20 Wolf Serious Look MK Ultra Meme Generator - Imgflip.png

Translation of the full text of this post, no comments (post comments separately)

本帖全文翻译,不做点评(另行发帖点评)。

HF23全文翻译:Steem Consensus Witness Statement : Hardfork 0.23 (Codename: New Steem) | hive

  ·  4 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment

I´m wondering why you are shining up on the list, but anyway you as a developer should have had stand out of the downvote battles, there was much more for you to downvote from BS, and all the others.
And let me tell you some there was not much guys who don´t take some money for there services they offer I remember one of them is @steemchiller and he was slapped also because he´s not agreeing with what the "old Gang" is doing to the new Investor (you know the case with his proposal?).

Maybe check out a proposal for yourself and the likwid account on steemit, or just talk to JS, your case seems a bit different from all the others to me.

Suerte ;)













































































  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment







































  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

They really be clowning.

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

I heard @elipowell is nothing more than Justins fluffer at this point. Know what I'm sayin?

I had to look that up lol

You may not know well, but I think it means that the server's location is there because the Internet is connected everywhere.

I can't find Philland. Very confused

image.png

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

I go there every few months for vacation.

Awesome, where the fuck is it?

Its where you and Sun will be fucking. Think about where you want that to be.

NOWHERE

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

You should flick this switch on steempeak:

image.png

I've just tried this and I got this. Any ideas what's up?
image.png

Everything on steem seems to be broken :/

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
Loading...
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment

Currently, there only are about 35 witnesses in the top 500 (not counting Justin Sun's sock puppets) who are running any of your fork versions. 93% of the top 500 witnesses disagree with what you guys are doing.

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

That is very true. I know of at least two that are running multiple top 20 witnesses, and I haven't even looked into it.













































































  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

Has happened before though. Ethereum (ETH) is the fork and Ethereum (ETC) is technically the original chain but it did not inherit the ticker symbol "ETH" nor the listing on exchanges.

Technically, ticker symbols are no-man's land, because they exist only in social consensus and not on the actual blockchain. So it would be up to the exchanges and market data sites to decide which of the forks would get the STEEM ticker.







































  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment

Do you agree with Justin Sun sucking Ned's dick for a discount on his Steem?

Does @elipowell suck your tiny cock too?

Do you finger @justyy's ass while you're blowing him?

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago (edited)

"Reap what the HIVE sow"

What a happy Thanksgiving festival. :)

Become what you hate.

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

What happened with your node? I think you should be in the top. Maybe I can help.

By half of you people I'm not even sure if you are serious. I mean, you can't be serious, right?

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

The minnows seem to be safe, it's just the biggest investors that get their accounts wiped. Whales have always been a problem to begin with, we don't need them. :P

If you think you don't need 'whales' you are sorely wrong. Anything you are doing right now on Steem or Hive is because of whales. Anything you do on any piece of technology requires whales. You need investors to do anything.

Loading...

Yeah, that was my point actually. The post was meant to drive home the ridiculousness of the HF. ;)

Ah, sorry hehe. I know there are numerous people on here that believe we don't need whales or people with large stakes. I've seen the comment threads and it just baffles me!

You need investors to do anything.

for now,...

Are you really happy that those hard-earned assets from the people who invested their time and money in the platform will be gone?

No, the comment was meant as satire. Ofc you need big investments to fund development, this HF ensures that won't happen anymore.

which hard earned money look on the list of accounts who will be affected, a lot of people who had taken the chance to double their funds (steem SP + HIVE HP) without doing nothing else than slap the new Investor in his face?
What about all the content creators who fill the pockets of the "Old Gang" didn´t they have the same right ?
Anybody on your side is thinking that the "old Gang" was overreacting in this and produced a huge damage to steemit, yeah but they don´t need it I know.

It´s not that nobody don´t need Investors, its about faith, behavior and good manner on this side also, and the HIVE buddies (the old Gang) throw the first stone without any substantial reason that´s the major point, nothing else matters ;)

Yeah you are right I bought STEEM after fork 😢 luckily I bought in 2100 sats

First they came for the whales but I did not speak out because I was no whale.

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

Perhaps the top should have been more inclusive?

A median payout of .6 is sure to excite very few people.

maybe yes, maybe no (.6 payout).

You all constantly ignoring facts and still run around telling "your" truth, but ever read carefully this lines from the post?

This is very clear written story from what is realy happening before, I stated this for a long time before the hardfork that going this way (on the side of the old Top-witnesses and their big friends) will lead to reaction from JS who was forced to do so from the "Old Gang" so why now cry and try to find a bunch of shitty reasons to discredit him again?

It is all about trust in one and behavior nothing else.

The Old Gang hat taken a wrong decision, which hurts a lot of active and solid steemians, many of them not quite in line with their (the Old Gangs") reaction to JS, and now wondering what the´ve earned with, so what ?!

This was ok for them when doing it to JS, but geting hurt the same way by JS is not ok ?

I still wonder how silly some Investors could be to think that this can be working without any damages on their side, they got way less money than JS so normaly better make friend to him or acquire tons of extra money to beat him so.

Anyway the damage is done and somebody will pay the price ;)

You all constantly ignoring facts and still run around telling "your" truth, but ever read carefully this lines from the post?

Lol, whatever.
Care cite some of my quotes?

Rich powerful people took control into their own hands.
Who did what first, last, and to whom is really irrelevant, at this point.

Both sides have been clear, get with the brown nosing or forget getting any rewards.

It remains to seen how far they wish to carry their selective rewarding of the effort here, but time won't lie to us.

I've been putting out daily content in excess of three years.
Approaching 20k posts.
You think i could get a vote from one of the golden children?
No.
All I've gotten is told I have tourettes, but the fool spelled it turrets, and i was supposed to be too stupid to catch his drift, though his sophisticated friends would know.

I was told straight out the gate that my content would not pass muster on steem, I don't see why the people making their own chain would change their content voting habits, so I stay here to see what Mr. Sun has in mind.

If i get rewarded here, I will continue beating my drum here, otherwise, I will put my attention to something else.
The same applies to hive.
Though, I may stay there just to be thorn in their sides.
You'd be surprised how quick a burr under a saddle blanket gets attention from other riders.

Thank you for your detailed answer, a very fitting statement, I will keep it similar ;)

Justin Sun can copy code and buyout existing companies but he can never force free people to become his slaves.

贾斯汀·孙(Justin Sun)可以复制代码并收购现有公司,但他永远不能强迫自由的人成为他的奴隶。

저스틴 선 (Justin Sun)은 코드를 복사하고 기존 회사를 매입 할 수는 있지만 자유인을 강제로 노예로 만들 수 없습니다.

Justin Sunはコードをコピーして既存の企業を買収することができますが、自由な人々に彼の奴隷になることを強制することはできません。

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

Maybe because they could dox them, if they wanted to?
Instead they just remove the steem.

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

Hello, can I buy your Engine Miner on Steem-engine? I have placed buy orders. thank you

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment







































Great citation. It's a pity Steem users won't happen to see it. I rarely suggest this, but this post actually should be cross-posted.

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment

I don't know. But you just can't make this up.

and I just noticed, there's no MEMO in that transfer! nobody gets to control these funds except for the receiver: bittrex!

At this point, even if the funds are never recovered by their original owners it is one of the better outcomes IMO.

I cant imagine Bittrex not executing their part. At least Justin Sunny Boy and his accomplices are not 23.5M Steem more rich! 😂😂😂 They are even to stupid to steel funds, even when they control the software hahaha

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

I heard the mother of @justyy fucked Justin Sun to get him his witness spot.

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

Thanks facts-cat!

Justin Sun can copy code and buyout existing companies but he can never force free people to become his slaves.

贾斯汀·孙(Justin Sun)可以复制代码并收购现有公司,但他永远不能强迫自由的人成为他的奴隶。

저스틴 선 (Justin Sun)은 코드를 복사하고 기존 회사를 매입 할 수는 있지만 자유인을 강제로 노예로 만들 수 없습니다.

Justin Sunはコードをコピーして既存の企業を買収することができますが、自由な人々に彼の奴隷になることを強制することはできません。

thanks for this. your answers were sorely needed.

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

Now the problem arises from the interchange with exchanges. Since you got an existing asset, and are seizing existing funds of people, that would mean that exchanges accepting this code are also accepting the removal of funds of people outside of the scope of the actual protocol. None of the people whose funds were seized got their funds in an illegitimate way (through hacking or similar, like in the case of Ethereum). Thus, that is actually quite complicated.

In the case of Hive, a new asset was created and people got this NEW asset based on a set of rules. That is fine since no ones existing assets got altered in any way.

In terms of security, I hope you are doing your math right, the vast majority of the votes on the witnesses on the steem chain comes from steemit inc. While only 20-30% of the votes on the hive chain come from freedom + blocktrades. The problem arises if one single legal entity is able to vote in/out all consensus participants. (That's why Tron was assessed a security in a recent lawsuit).

It seems that you still don't get this part.

It would be totally fine if HIVE started from scratch. Who cares, and who may care about what the initial launchers would choose.

HIVE is not. It is literally a code-copy with all the history (posting, assets, etc). And then core HIVE guys transferred HIVE assets: see HIVE own transaction records as linked in the OP.

If what HIVE did is okay, this HF is totally fine too.


Moreover, there will be appeal process (likely via SPS) so community may change this witness decision if they would like to.


For the security part, it is not an important topic (for now, and for us) to discuss anyway - if someone wants to focus on this, he or she may pursue legal actions for it.

No, you are not getting it. It doesn't matter what Hive puts in their brand new database. If they copy in bitcoin blocks, ethereum blocks, whaleshare blocks. It's their database, they can fill it with all open source blockchain material they can.
And users can then accept to use it or not, and exchanges can accept to list it or not. But it's NEW. Even though they copied over state from steem. It's a new copy.

It doesn't matter if that past material comes from Steem. It's a new database that is filled with selective material.

Steem is an old database and you're removing material from the existing database in a hardfork.

Those are fundamentally different things.

You should then go speak with consensus witnesses on Hive since a lot of them were OK with nulling the stake of Steemit Inc several months back.

They accepted the idea to null Inc just because of consensus (regardless of the reasons), it's normal they said, but now you are preaching as everyone from Hive that taking a similar decision based on consensus is a problem?

yea,

you got it, that´s the main issue, but they literally ignore it because its better for them, its just propaganda ;)

Actually, they were not nulling it ever. The discussion was always ask Steemit Inc to null it themselves or start a new chain.

The discussion was always ask Steemit Inc to null it themselves or start a new chain.

No, we all read the leaked messages from the secret slack group.

I for one did. And voted to undo the airdrop exclusion. I would have voted to not do this exclusion as well.

If someone told me early enough.

But both Hive and Steem seem to keep there votes secret until it's too late.

It seems that several points are being repeated. Let me focus on one thing.

Say (as you claim) HIVE is new.

then is it okay to move HIVE stakes? you can see the blockchain record. If there was no HIVE, then there cannot be any transfer. But there were transfers, which means that existing assets are illegally transferred.

In fact, steem.dao account still holds these "stolen" assets.

How can you explain this?

If the move of the assets is defined on the creation of hive and everyone that joins hive knows about this. Then it is fine. This makes this a part of the rule of the system.

(Similarly as inflation rewards, or witness voting, etc).

The problem is if you change the rules after releasing a chain. Then that is problematic.

When I look at the blockchain record, the transfer occurred before Hive blockchain started. You can see the record on the steem blockchain, and the action was completed by a Tron Foundation witness

https://steemd.com/b/41818752

Not sure what difference any of that might make, but there it is

Oi, this conversation has gone in circles. New assets are new assets. I could take a picture of a billionaires USD account and give him a token I just made up out of thin air and it isn't stealing anything. Not sure why this is a difficult concept for this other guy to understand.

Hive didn't start from scratch, it originated from the need of a part of Steem community that believed more strongly than the rest in the ethos of decentralization.

For your information Steem stayed for weeks under the full control of one entity (Justin Sun) who controlled all 20 witnesses spots with newly created sock puppets voted in by exchanges users funds and supposedly non-voting Steemit's pre-mine.

Whatever else you claim it started from was opensouce code in the public domain.













































































  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

Spitting blockchain into two happens all the time. I think there are four Bitcoins chains and three Ethereum chains by now.

Those new chains always took new names and applied to exchanges to be added under those new names. Effectively doubling the coin for each user. Normal thing to do.

Confiscating coins is not something not at all normal. Confiscating is setting a bad precedence.

If Steem really wanted to get rid of the users they should have powered the accounts down, blocked them from power up.

And yet, Hive should have gone that route as well: Forced power down instead of airdrop exclusion.

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

  ·  4 years ago (edited)

Steem HF23 and the Hive split are different situations because of asset continuity.

  • The HIVE hardfork did not promise continuity. It is a new token under a new name. HIVE then sought exchange listings as a new token.
  • The 0.23 steem hardfork is not issuing a new token, changing names or any such thing. The HF23 Steem blockchain will, afaik, leverage the exchange listings of the previous HF Steem. Also, continuity of stakeholder balances has been a feature of Steem hard-forks up until this particular one.

YMMV on how important one thinks continuity is important to the sanctity of private funds. I think continuity is very important.

However, this opens up a lot of interesting legal questions. For one, while people should not have their assets censored, technically, people should be able to run any fork they want.

So, what legal argument exists to say the witnesses are obligated to continue running a specific version of the code? I don't think witnesses can be compelled to run only a certain version. If they could be compelled to run a version it could open up for lawsuits all blockchains that ever forked.

This situation might indicate that blockchains simply don't offer censorship resistance unless consensus is reached by more participants than can be influenced toward a single goal.

I agree the legal ramifications will be interesting, should it ever be tested. I have my guesses on a few angles the lawyers might try, but I'm not prepared to put my thoughts about that on-chain.

  ·  4 years ago (edited)

Anyone who doesn't see the broad picture of what is happening here must wake up and realize as soon as possible the progressive chain of actions soon to happen (in the near future) resulting from using the Legacy Legal system to resolve a Cryptographic Currency DAO related problem.

Here is the chain of actions (I can envision the future).

Some sort of lawsuit goes forward in US courts surrounding cryptographic currency. This is actually engineered/designed by the powers that be for a specific reason.

Resulting from this lawsuit, DAOs are unfairly regulated as the public is not educated about DAO (as we are all still learning how to DAO).

Please be a responsible member of this cryptographic DAO and learn proper technology history. What happened to software as a result from people taking digital matters into legacy courtrooms?

https://bbs.fandom.com/wiki/SEA_vs._PKWARE

Please, we MUST NEVER repeat this problem.

We MUST solve democratic repos. And parties involved MUST resolve their differences for the overall good of all future cryptographic DAO technology..
WATCH THIS

DO NOT F%^$ THIS UP. IF YOU F^$% THIS UP, HUMANITY WILL BE SET BACK DECADES, IF NOT HUNDREDS OF YEARS.







































  ·  4 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment

LMAO

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

Thanks fuck you, too.

Damn they did it.

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment







































How is it any different than *uckerberg on facebook deleting accounts and controlling the posts? Steemit has never been a decentralized platform so if the new boss looks different from the old boss it's because you weren't one of the hogs sucking up the reward pool. Class action lawsuit could go both ways from my perspective.

How is it different? Money. Real money put in by investors and then stolen.

Im amazed Justin was able to come back after his coins got heisted.

https://medium.com/@TronFoundation/the-truth-behind-steem-takeover-38179feba963

Justin’s version of events is bogus. What else is new?

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

Take care of you? Searching for hitman on the dark web? Lol

That's not necessary, it's all covered by legal frameworks. You're weird.

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

i know one account on that list that had nothing to do with everything you wrote here. he was just not happy with what is going on on steem. you know who he is, and you know why he is on that list. could you explain to others why you are deleting a small steem account, just because he wrote some comments that you don't like?

No response, of course.

they cant say anything, because they know that he did nothing. he never used bots to spam, he never spamed with posts, he did not fram the chain, had nothing with creation of hive. only thing he did is called justin chinese dictator and criticized korean community. also the amount of steem he owns can't do anything to the chain. they are taking his steem, just because they don't like him.

How about stealing the accounts @mottler and @mottler-1. I haven't seen much talk of that.

All these two accounts have ever done is mine Steem and power it up. Not even the nanometer-thin excuses they offer provides any justification for stealing that guy's stake.

https://steemd.com/@mottler
https://steemd.com/@mottler-1

don't know who he is, but for him they probably have some kind of conspiracy theory that it is blocktrades or someone like that.
i just checked, wow he has no posts, no comments, never even transfered 1 steem out? he most probably does not even know he will lose 500k$ tomorrow. crazy.

I guess they just want to steal more STEEM for themselves. Might as well take it from someone who's never used their account, even though they may still hold the keys. Typical thief logic.

What the fuck!

damn i wonder who that guy is. but let these koreans undermine themselves ;)

:D

Where can I see proof that I, or any other individual on that list, participated in criminal activity? Where exactly did I cross a line?

Top Kek

Promises should apply to everyone, no?

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

The only protection i want is a blockchain that protects my funds.

Steem (and to a lesser degree Hive) are currently showing me that my funds are not save and are only one hard fork away from been seized.

In the past all I have to fear when criticising a whiteness was a downvote. Now I have to fear that my funds are seized at the next HF.

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

You morons are going to get so fucked. 😂
You do know your names are public? haha

Your language reminds me of xxxxxxxxxx. It seems that you picked it up from him. Guess you guys are good friends.

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment

Your imagination is going too far, so I don't know what to say at this point.

Sounds like you volunteer to "sign up as a spokeperson" for HIVE core guys and what you got in return is that one of them, xxxxxxxxxx, in fact bullies you over there. Except that, what you got is close to zero and someone from the core takes all the credit.

Good luck with that - I guess that's what you expected and asked for, right?

I'm just telling you what happened. I do not claim to tell "what will happen", as some people who don't even know what they are doing frequently do.

This would be my last reply to you. Have fun on the other side.

Your imagination is going too far, so I don't know what to say at this point.

For your own sake, hope im wrong here.

Sounds like you volunteer to "sign up as a spokeperson" for HIVE core guys and what you got in return is that one of them, xxxxxxxxxx, in fact bullies you over there. Except that, what you got is close to zero and someone from the core takes all the credit.

I never said HIVE was perfect. Just much better then STEEM.
See, when i speak my mind i do it because i believe its the right thing to do. I expect no compensation for it and will take any consequence that might come my way for speaking out openly.
Unlike you guys that held STEEM hostage with your votes to benefit yourself in some way and got fucked in the end because of it.

  ·  4 years ago (edited)

Yeah, on Hive the most you can get for pissing someone off is being downvoted. You can still speak your mind without worries.

On Steem you can get your funds taken from you. Big difference.

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

Pay someone to beat the shit out of you? Lol are we still in grade school? You have a good sense of humor.

Its hardly grade school what will happen to you guys.

  ·  4 years ago (edited)

What do you mean by "you guys"? I didnt do anything lol. Good riddance.

Lol wow im scared!

I am pretty sure that does not apply to someone who stole first. Seizure of criminal activity related assets is normal.

That being said, the only remaining point is that whether someone is involved in such criminal activity. For that part, (as always?) community will decide.

I'm very sure you're an idiot without a moral compass.

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

fuck everyone

Let's see him do it. Up the ass?

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

I want him to fuck you.

Eww no thanks

I can ensure it.

@cadawg needs to #MeToo













































































  ·  4 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment
Loading...
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

Justin Sun can copy code and buyout existing companies but he can never force free people to become his slaves.

贾斯汀·孙(Justin Sun)可以复制代码并收购现有公司,但他永远不能强迫自由的人成为他的奴隶。

저스틴 선 (Justin Sun)은 코드를 복사하고 기존 회사를 매입 할 수는 있지만 자유인을 강제로 노예로 만들 수 없습니다.

Justin Sunはコードをコピーして既存の企業を買収することができますが、自由な人々に彼の奴隷になることを強制することはできません。

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

Did you know Justin Sun sucked Ned's dick to get a small discount on his Steem?

Are you even capable of writing a sentence without including the words dick and suck?

곰돌이가 @menerva님의 소중한 댓글에 시세변동을 감안하여 $0.017을 보팅해서 $0.025을 지켜드리고 가요. 곰돌이가 지금까지 총 7972번 $110.400을 보팅해서 $109.333을 구했습니다. @gomdory 곰도뤼~ 곰돌이 서비스는 6월 20일 11pm에 종료됩니다.

곰돌이가 @gomdory님의 소중한 댓글에 $0.030을 보팅해서 $0.012을 살려드리고 가요. 곰돌이가 지금까지 총 7993번 $110.833을 보팅해서 $109.782을 구했습니다. @gomdory 곰도뤼~ 곰돌이 서비스는 6월 20일 11pm에 종료됩니다.

Are you offended because you caught your dad sucking your moms dick?

  ·  4 years ago (edited)

Hey man. Better than you sucking your mom's dick... not that theres anything wrong with that.

You make words too vulgar.
Not worth answering.

Fuck
Dick
Pussy
Cocksucker
Asshole
Cunt
Retard

Yes. These are the words on your face.
This is your exact level.
And it is also the level of the Hive fanatics.

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago (edited)

Sounds just like the conman in the white house.

Hive was never a threat to Steemit. Justin Sun was the threat, and continues to be a threat as demonstrated yet again here. Hive was the solution to the threat. An imperfect solution, but as the saying goes, "any port in a storm."

The demand for a complete community split is insane, but it is being pushed by Sun and Steemit, not Hive. The campaign of censorship and arbitrary terms of service have driven out those of us who had hoped to see some sort of truce come about. But every action taken since shows how power-mad the new Steemit team has become. Anyone who chooses to support Steemit Inc. with full knowledge of these actions is complicit.

  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  4 years ago Reveal Comment

I'm really sad everything get to this point! Pandora's box was opened even she was told not to do it!
Captura.JPG
By the way, I will upvote a proposal to return these people their funds, if any.

Keep in mind the context in which I made that quote. It was referring to the question of whether or not Steemit Ninjamined stake was Justin Sun's private property after the purchase of Steemit, or if it belonged to the community. Further, that stake was never actually moved out of any wallet by the former consensus witnesses.

In this case, the plan is to remove the stake from the wallets of the confirmed owners of the stake.

It's quite the escalation, don't you think?

Yes, I think so, and is sad.

Let bygones be bygones.

If you have seen what has happened, you know who prevented this from happening.


And we don't know who or what gave HIVE (witnesses?) the authority to freeze user's STEEM at 22.2 and seize user's HIVE after the fork. If someone can answer this, he or she may answer your questions as well.

And we don't know who or what gave HIVE (witnesses?) the authority to freeze user's STEEM at 22.2

Yes we do. Justin Sun did. It was in the terms of service of the Steemit website he owns.

D7B9E2AE092848A391115C27A6C51087.jpeg

Justin agreed that his transactions may not be completed as he did not own the Steem blockchain.

The witnesses clearly announced a temporary freeze of his transactions due to the facts that

  1. He had purchased a potentially disruptive amount of stake in a back room deal, not via the markets which would have benefitted other Steem holders and precluded him from acquiring such a massive stake due to the run up in price it would have caused.
  2. Justin had recently exercised control of founders tokens on the Tron blockchain to manipulate block producer governance.
  3. Justin had announced a migration of Steem to the Tron blockchain, even beginning to put a token exchange process in place through Poloniex.
  4. During all this had never spoken with Steem elected witnesses.

Justin reacted rather amicably to the freeze, apologizing to the community and scheduling a meeting with the top 50 Steem witnesses to clarify his plans and build the new working relationship.

Of course, that was manipulative stalling as he colluded with exchanges to utilize customer deposits to overthrow rightful Steem governance and install 20 fake sock puppet witnesses, bringing us to our present state.

So, as you can see, Justin Sun’s terms of service explicitly approve his inability to transact under HF 22.2; yet he had the stupidity to call it a criminal act.

The only criminality is that these terms of service still state that Steemit Inc. does not control the Steem blockchain, which is factually untrue. It’s the reason why their official communications always feign fake ignorance of new developments that censor, freeze, and seize the assets of Justin’s opposition, while Steemit Inc. instantly removes any dissenting witnesses from the consensus ranks.

I don't see how SF22.2 is related to HF23. When was the last time 22.2 actually had a chance of taking over consensus? About 3 months ago.

The plan here is to simply take assets that belong to others.

You could put it into an escrow account operated by a lawyer to be sold if your goal was something other than simple theft.

By the way I voted for every proposal to airdrop Hive to all.













































































The consensus was almost unanimous.
Very few people were liking Ned, let alone some unknown that came in like a wrecking ball, we almost forked stinc out sooner.
I was for it.
Couldn't get the majority of stake to break their mind control.
Chainbase is open source, it can't be stolen.
Ultimately, they came to the same conclusion some months later.

Let them go, they should leave peaceably, too.

I'll be glad when these rich people get back to farming us, rather than pushing us around.

Hola como estas y mis apreciados saludos amigo. Me gustaría si usted lo permite pasar mi usuario y revisar mis publicaciones en verdad no estaría nada mal que me des un consejo de parte de usted mi vida es steemit y dependo de esta excelente plataforma para ayudar mis abuelos y mis estudios de la universidad, de verdad necesito su consejo para aprender más y así ayudarme y ayudar a más personas que es lo importante ayudar a otros y eh aprendido un poco con el tiempo que tengo y de su gran agrado en apoyarme con un voto, mis abuelos y yo le estaremos muy agradecidos. Dios me lo bendiga y siempre amigo @dev.supporters.