@jacobtothe I used to write a lot of long form content for Steemit. The 6 or so articles I link to at the bottom of this post are just a few; there's a lot more. But I stopped doing that because Steemit does not have a very good rewards system: The rewards didn't match the work. So now I give steemit the level of quality that matches the rewards I get. $0.003. Well, I used to. Now I just don't care at all. I find it ironic that you'd complain about the length and quality of my content while ALL of my content is currently being systematically downvoted, regardless of it's "length" or "quality". Furthermore, some people don't want to read a long article. If everyone on Steemit wrote long articles a lot less posts would be read. Short, concise and informative can also be considered high quality, and can inspire someone to do further research.
Posted using Partiko Android
You got far more than $0.03 before I started flagging.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
#newsteem is resulting in far better rewards for content creators now. Curation matters again. Steem prices are beginning to rise from the depths of bid bot buyers and sellers dumping their ill-gotten gains for Bitcoin. But if you're going to downvote my constructive criticism comments with a sock puppet account, you're not going to engender any sympathy from me if @themarkymark keeps flagging you into oblivion.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit