On Meaning and Meritocracy
My writing helper
Most of us wish to have some sort of meaning in our lives. What qualifies as meaning varies of course – for some, it's their family; for some, their work; for others, volunteering; still others, religion; and others, art, to name just a few possibilities. We see such pursuits as noble, and profoundly human. I can think of no one who would describe searching for or finding meaning in your life as a bad thing. And yet.
In our society, we like to think we are a meritocracy, but that's not true. Geniuses are born to abusive, poverty-stricken families and good people do desperate things to survive in our harsh world that the majority would call "immoral." Too often, these people tried playing by the rules only to find out the deck is stacked, and not in their favor.
"Playing by the rules" usually means attending school and getting decent grades, which a child might do, but be rejected by their college of choice because their school was a poor school with a bad rating and their parents could not afford a private one. They might be denied scholarships for not having enough extracurriculars when they had to work a job to survive, or babysit younger siblings, or both. So they go to a community college, where a sub-par education not taught by actual professors gets them tens of thousands of dollars in debt, only to find that the degree-required jobs don't pay much more than flipping burgers, with more competition, and carrying that debt. When the job listing requires college but pays nine dollars an hour, you have not improved your life or lifted yourself out of poverty.
"Playing by the rules" demands that you work any job that will pay for your labor, no matter how unfairly. It requires you to keep doing that even when your boss treats you like garbage and your hours are consistently cut and you have no access to health insurance. It sometimes demands two jobs, or three, or school and work, and claims that anything less is lazy.
So while you're working a 9-5, Monday through Friday and delivering papers at 3 AM, while studying for a degree program, perhaps your Masters or a new trade if you already have a Bachelor's… when are you supposed to find meaning if being a call center rep and newspaper boy doesn't do it for you?
You're not. To ask for the time necessary to fulfill a basic human need like meaning is selfish, or frivolous, or pie-in-the-sky, if you are one of the millions of unlucky bastards who have to sell your time for just enough dollars to survive with a roof over your head. "Meaning" is for the lucky, privileged, successful people who have "made it."
This not only drains your soul, your psyche, and your energy, but is yet another double-edged sword for the poor and working class.
Oh, you don't have time to spend with your kids? You're a terrible, neglectful parent! You cut back your hours so you could parent but now you're on food stamps? You leech on society! You spend your time and money on art and art supplies? Better get your head out of the clouds and invest. You lost your 401(k) in the stock market crash? Well, you can still work when you're 80, right? You gave all your money to your church? Well it's your own fault you're broke now for being so gullible! You don't contribute to your church?? You greedy bastard! You don't go to church?! You must be a vile, moralless devil worshipper!
Meaning and the search for it is not for the lower classes. You are supposed to be content to increase value for shareholders while living off ramen noodles and giving 60% of your income to your landlord. Forever. Unless you win the lotto or America's Got Talent. Your hard work and effort will never be rewarded, but you'll hear some great harp ballads played by angels when you die!
How is this fair? How is this human? The meritocracy is a lie. In other times or places, we call this a caste system or serfdom. In America we call it "freedom."
An exceptional example DOES NOT prove the great leap is possible for everyone. An exception is an exception because they defy the rule. And usually had a lot of luck in terms of help, and being at the right place, at the right time, with the right skills. Michelangelo could not have been Steve Jobs nor Steve Jobs, Michelangelo, if their times and places have been reversed. You could be the reincarnation of Einstein, but if born in a village where girls don't go to school and you happen to be one, you're unlikely to revolutionize physics. You could be a straight, white male, the trifecta of privilege, but if born to abusive parents who are so terrible you run away when you're fifteen and live on the streets, the odds of you becoming a motivational success story who gives Ted Talks and publishes a best-selling self-help book are low. Not impossible… but perhaps the same odds as that lotto ticket.
So what's an overworked, underpaid, meaningless proletariat to do?
Guillotine building instructions:
...I kid.
Kind of.
We need a Universal Basic Income. Everyone deserves to have their basic needs met. Everyone. I don't care if you're lazy or have great work ethic; are able to work at all or not; are smart or stupid; male or female; black or white; Christian or Muslim; gay or straight. Everyone deserves a roof over their heads, food in their bellies, clothes on their backs, fresh, clean water, electricity, heating, and communications. Regardless if you are working, got laid off, quit, or anything in between.
Think about how many more Great American Novels we'd get. How many more artists. How many involved parents raising the next generation. How many inventors. How many volunteers. How many people doing jobs they love, instead of what they could get to pay rent.
How much happier we would be. How much less ill from stress- and exhaustion-related disease. How much more rested. How much more fulfilled.
But who will do the work?! you say. Firstly, so many jobs are being automated right now, there is ever-less work to be done. Self-driving cars and trucks. Brick and mortar stores going out of business because people are shopping online. Those Amazon fulfillment centers are staffed by exhausted employees now – but technology is ever advancing. Computer programs. 3D printers. Factory automation. Robot caregivers! The list goes on. We have less to worry about outsourcing and Immigrants Took Er Jerbs than we do automation.
And those jobs that can't be automated (yet)? Some people will want to do them – some people love being doctors or scientists or musicians or whatever it is that they do. The other jobs will have to be fairly compensated to make it worth anybody's while.
Shock! Horror! A fair wage for shitty work nobody wants to do?! Madness! Anarchy!!
There will always be people who want to work. They still deserve to be paid fairly for their trouble. There will always be people willing to crawl in the sewer if the price is right. They really deserve to be paid well. Would you want to do it? No? Then pony up and pay the man.
WHERE WILL THE MONEY COME FROM, I hear the fiscal conservatives scream.
Without even getting into monetary theory, it's simple, really: stop spending trillions on warmaking and CORPORATE handouts. These same fiscal conservatives probably also like the idea of a free market, but that's not what we have right now. Oil companies get subsidies to destroy and pollute, without which they wouldn't even be profitable. Why are we funding century old tech instead of investing in new and better tech?
"BUT THEY HATE US FOR OUR FREEDOM AND WE HAVE TO DEFEND OURSELVES!" Listen. They hate us because we bomb them to hell and murder their families and oust their democratically elected leaders. If we stopped doing that, there would be less terrorism. Also, it's harder to recruit people to blow themselves up if they are able to provide for their families. Just like in America, where the majority of voluntary military recruitment is among the poor and the rich dodge the draft, in the Middle East, a lot of AQ and Daesh recruits join up for a paycheck. We have the largest military in the world many times over in an era of growing peace. Don't believe me? Read The Better Angels of Our Nature by Steven Pinker.
Take all of that money that is currently poisoning the planet and killing people, and improve the world instead. Let the meritocracy actually exist. Give everyone a chance, and see what improvements rise to the top when harmful industries are not given an unfair advantage. See how much crime goes down with the erasure of poverty and desperation. See how innovative people are when they have the luxury to think about something besides the looming rent or their empty bellies.
Give peace a chance – we've already tried war and suffering. They failed. It's time to try something new.
This gem of a post was discovered by the OCD Team!
Reply to this comment if you accept, and are willing to let us share your gem of a post! By accepting this, you have a chance to receive extra rewards and one of your photos in this article may be used in our compilation post!
You can follow @ocd – learn more about the project and see other Gems! We strive for transparency.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
OCD Team rocks!!! :) Thank you for all you do!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
OCD is really great, I have to agree :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you, I would love that! I just followed y'all so I can see what other good stuff you find. :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
One point you missed is the fact that too many argue against UBI because they feel that people wont have "worth" without work.
Here is my take on that:
A) Do you think somebody working for minimum wage at McDs or Wal-Mart derives much value from their work? Do you think their "worth" is high because of their profession?
B) People have worth simply because they are breathing. That is where their worth is derived from.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Exactly. I have never derived worth from my clock punching work. I touched a bit on "deservingness" in my first essay here (on Solidarity and Compassion), but now in my sleep-deprived state I don't know if I got into "worth" from work in the sense that you mean. Like, I understand there are some who retire and don't know what to do with themselves, but that would surely decrease if the while society was shifting (they'd have more people to interact with; they wouldn't feel like the only one), and they also could then do those jobs that still need to he done by a human and derive worth from doing a true service that people need done.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Great writing Wren! Thank you so much for putting your heart and soul here on the blockchain.
Yes. So much Yes.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
🙌 Hello! I like to read smart people and their advice. Mutual subscription is a good start to friendship.(I became your follower)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@eileenbeach has voted on behalf of @minnowpond. If you would like to recieve upvotes from minnowponds team on all your posts, simply FOLLOW @minnowpond.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@OriginalWorks
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The @OriginalWorks bot has determined this post by @phoenixwren to be original material and upvoted it!
To call @OriginalWorks, simply reply to any post with @originalworks or !originalworks in your message!
To enter this post into the daily RESTEEM contest, upvote this comment! The user with the most upvotes on their @OriginalWorks comment will win!
For more information, Click Here!
Special thanks to @reggaemuffin for being a supporter! Vote him as a witness to help make Steemit a better place!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Devils advocate time!
While I agree on many of your points, and I do believe there is a huge bias in the way the world is set up, I feel you are also missing some others.
We are a partial meritocracy. There are things you can do in life, without going to college, that allow you to become successful. For instance, many people who, "get rich," are simply ballsy in that they take risks that pay off. This also means that for every rich person, there are probably a lot of people who tried and failed.
Your post about 10's of thousands of dollars in debt for community college I feel to be a stretch. My community college cost me less then $1800 a semester. At 4 semesters for an associates degree, that is $7200 I spent on tuition. Of course, this does not include books, but the chances of that being beyond 2800 is pretty low. So let us say I spent 10k for my associates degree.
Over two years, if budgeting correctly, you could go to school and get a degree without going into debt at all simply by working a minimum wage job. This would however mean that you are only taking care of yourself. If you have children, or are taking care of siblings, it can make it harder. It does mean that you could just go at a much slower rate. There is also government grants and scholarships that can help you get through even community college.
For getting your bachelors and not getting a job, what degree are you getting? Just because you have a degree does not mean that job market is a good one to be entering. Certain job markets have absolutely no job opportunities. Others, they are begging people to get a degree and come work for them. If you get a degree in English, the chances of finding a good paying job are slim, and you very well may be spending your time flipping burgers.
You offer of Universal Basic Income as an idea to fix this, yet I question if it will actually stem innovation. Many times, people climb out of poverty so that they can live a better life. What happens when that better life is just given to them and they do not have to work for it? Will people be less inclined to innovate? Where does the money come from? How can we pay for it? I know there are specific places that are trying it out. How has it worked for them?
The cards may be stacked, but it doesn't make the game impossible, it just means it isn't easy.
While I think that your post has validity, I think it is stuck in a biased position that needs to have opposite viewpoints brought into it. Try writing a post that gives the opposite view to everything you are stating.
Keep up the great posting and I like forward to seeing more of your ideas and thoughts!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you for your thoughtful comment. I apologize for not being able to respond with the attention it deserves just now ...I just got home from a very draining doctor's appointment and am fresh out of brain cells. As soon I have a couple to rub together and get a spark going again, I will reply in earnest! :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No problem! Take your time :]
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"The “Pathways to Prosperity” study by the Harvard Graduate School of Education in 2011 shows that just 56 percent of college students complete four-year degrees within six years. Only 29 percent of those who start two-year degrees finish them within three years."
from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-attn-andrea-education-dropouts/why-college-students-stop-short-of-a-degree-idUSBRE82Q0Y120120327
So, maybe it's POSSIBLE to earn a degree carefully managed, it's certainly not the norm. And to do so without debt, while only taking care of yourself, is disregarding the high cost of rent and groceries and gas/public transport on that minimum wage job. I had little left after rent, electric, bus pass, groceries, and phone/internet, and I made more than minimum wage. And I didn't have a big data plan (I don't even have a smart phone anymore) or cable tv or anything like that. Maybe rent is much cheaper where you are? But when you look at those studies about average rent vs. minimum wage, they show that most people can't afford it on their own.
So I think your example of what you accomplished is one of those exceptions that defies the rule. Possible, sure. Common? Not so much.
Here's an article about how it would actually grow the economy, and if funded well, would not necessarily lead to inflation:
https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/10/05/how-to-fund-a-universal-basic-income-without-increasing-taxes-or-inflation/
...and again, that's rather working within current parameters. There are others who get into MMT (not my specialty, I haven't studied it much, which is why I didn't get into it) who say the thought of budgeting like you would a checkbook is all wrong and not how government spending actually works. But my funding thought is neither: my solution is to take the trillions we spend on war machines and corporate handouts (adding in current money spent on welfare projects that will no longer be needed), and there is the funding, regardless of quantative easing or MMT or any other financial workarounds that are really beyond my scope as a layperson.
As far as having a degree and not getting a job, check out the video I shared in the following post, "humans need not apply." Even if you chose the right degree for the right time where there are currently jobs (but think about how often and quickly that shifts), with automation this time, it's not going to be a matter of retraining for a new industry. This is why big names like Elon Musk are pro-UBI. Also, the humanities and art being sacrificed so that you can't study them if you want to live gets back to my "meaning" and "is that a life worth living" point. If we all live in a soulless workaday artless left brain practicality only world? A lot of people would be dead inside. We deserve art and philosophy and meaning AND food on the table.
I have read reports about how people's participation in either work or other socially beneficial pursuits did not decline with a UBI, and the counter punch article touched on it:
"Welfare can encourage laziness, because benefits go down as earned income goes up. But studies have shown that a UBI distributed equally regardless of income does not have that result. In 1968, President Richard Nixon initiated a successful trial showingthat the money had little impact on the recipients’ working hours. People who did reduce the time they worked engaged in other socially valuable pursuits, and young people who were not working spent more time getting an education. Analysis of a similar Canadian trial found that employment rates among young adults did not change, high-school completion rates increased, and hospitalization rates dropped by 8.5 percent. Larger experiments in India have reached similar results."
...but I can't find the more in depth article just now. If I find it again, I'll post it.
Hope this answers some of your questions, and thanks for the discussion!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit