Perhaps influenced by the way one of the writers is clear and pleasant at the same time to convey the ideas and meanings, which are sometimes excessive and often rhetorical, characterized by some intelligence and savvy in bringing the attention of the reader completely, and expel all the boredom can be seen, or the suspicion of misunderstanding, or dumping in description The naive that makes the writer shy child when standing in front of his colleagues in the section, memorizing the lessons saved seriously exaggerated, and has clasped his arms over his chest, and buried his eyes in his shoes .. Do students pay attention to what he says or benefit?
I do not want this language and style, as much as I want clarity of expression. The symbolism is a method of writing undoubtedly without a doubt, but it is a difficult game and accurate technical precision, and is not good use Kiva and as it will end to write tons of sentences pedantic not first and no other. This is my observation about many young writers. But even more than come out on us in television and call them writers and poets. They find imitators (Ghada al-Samman), Ahlam Mostaganemi, and others like them in what they write of emotional nonsense, and then do not even know the tradition.
In order to ensure - I am the other - the arrival of my idea to the reader, which was the subject (the arrival of the idea to the reader) .. Put an example of these idiosyncratic terms that you can hear that the writer (Ghada Samman) or any of those names promoted commercial, even accusing yourself of default And the linguistic impotence: (Love is like the spring flowers, which are thrashed by the groans of the self, but the effects of the soul behind the floods of defeated nostalgia, but love, the hallmarks of the bitter entity)!
You got a 16.67% upvote from @votebuster courtesy of @sahda!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit