Repliessteemitboard (66)in gridcoin • 5 years agoRE: Focusing on one project should not actually be more beneficial?Congratulations @fortex! You received a personal award! Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 2 years! You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on…steemitboard (66)in gridcoin • 6 years agoRE: Focusing on one project should not actually be more beneficial?Congratulations @fortex! You received a personal award! Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 1 year! Click here to view your Board Support SteemitBoard's project …hotbit (58)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Time and Work Based Model for GridCoin Reward MechanismFirst we need to even up situation between project. For yoyo I've tested 2 subprojects and in that case rewards are consistent. Without direct control of boinc platform improving subprojects scoring…nexusprime (50)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Focusing on one project should not actually be more beneficial?Generally your observation is correct. It shouldn't matter if you work multiple projects. However, not all tasks are well coded. On certain projects the check-pointing is not handled correctly.…travelagent (25)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Focusing on one project should not actually be more beneficial?As someone new to Bionc/GridCoin, thank you for the great information.rhoff (34)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Focusing on one project should not actually be more beneficial?I think fortex is correct in saying, "This is because the mag for a project is capped, you are essentially competing for magnitude against yourself." I'm new to Gridcoin, but I thought about this…gregan (59)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Focusing on one project should not actually be more beneficial?Having a few projects ensures that your rigs have something to do if a source of work units dry up or are in maintenance.teknix (41)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Focusing on one project should not actually be more beneficial?I admit giving that advise. but in reality. I don't practice it. Its the best advice you can give for people with a few computers and also for new comers.teknix (41)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Focusing on one project should not actually be more beneficial?"Why do people say that you should focus on one project for max benefit" its the safest and easiest path/advice to give. might not be the most optimal. not everyone has a rig like dutchnexusprime (50)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: You can optimize your MAG even more by selecting best subprojects for your hardware. (solo only)Great stuff! The differences in credit/second changing based on sub project definitely caused issues with the tables I made. Some of the hosts where super optimized and scored 40-50% higher than…jlamb75 (36)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: You can optimize your MAG even more by selecting best subprojects for your hardware. (solo only)Thanks for posting this, @fortex. I've been meaning to try optimizing my projects based on my hardware and this post should help spur me to getting that done sooner rather than later.novicewriter (25)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: You can optimize your MAG even more by selecting best subprojects for your hardware. (solo only)Thanks, I'd already started trying to get my head around optimisation. I've just dropped out of GRC pooling into Solo and need to figure best options, given my very old kit.parejan (62)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: You can optimize your MAG even more by selecting best subprojects for your hardware. (solo only)Thanks for this @fortex, the benefit is not only for solo crunchers but it applies for pool members as well. Another example where you can optimize your magnitude is for NFS@home -zamaza (37)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Why I dont think that we should remove Moo Wrapper! from whitelisti don't think the moo project has enough in common with the scientific process. that was actually how this whole discussion started: i agree with you that an automatic system would be better, but…dutch (61)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Why I dont think that we should remove Moo Wrapper! from whitelistIt was actually done by the same project. They have already decrypted two messages at shorter key lengths, the only difference for the third message being that the key length is even longer. We…zamaza (37)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Why I dont think that we should remove Moo Wrapper! from whitelistThe arguments you bring to support moo are weak/trivial. I also agree with @artstein. Distributed computing All of the BOINC projects have in some way helped to advance distributed computing.…artstein (37)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Why I dont think that we should remove Moo Wrapper! from whitelistI am not being hostile, even though my comment might have looked like that. As you said, you wanted to breed discussion, and you did - I stated my point of view using strong words in order to…artstein (37)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Why I dont think that we should remove Moo Wrapper! from whitelistYou have not convinced me in the slightest. Your arguments are weak and far-fetched. "Historical achievement"? Really? Especially with a challenge that is pretty much long gone and cancelled? We…theissen (52)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Why I dont think that we should remove Moo Wrapper! from whitelistAre you sure the prize would still be paid? Didn't the challenge already end and they are only crunching on it for fun?fortex (41)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: PSA: What to do if your difficulty < 0.05 and/or net weight < 300,000 (i.e. if you’re on a fork) [Windows]Ahh, silly me, you have to use the hash and not the block number.
