It should only be allowed to abort when there's a serious possibility of serious handicap. If the baby is healthy and in good state, even if it misses a leg or a limb (which is not a serious handicap, because the child can still live a fulfilling life) then it should be forbidden and against the law. People don't want children or to get pregnant??? It's your responsibility to keep it that way since there are plenty of ways to avoid it. Can't blame the child for you not shoving it in without a condom or a pill.
RE: The Voluntaryist Position On Abortion (Are Children In Utero Self-Owners?)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The Voluntaryist Position On Abortion (Are Children In Utero Self-Owners?)
So people with disabilities aren't self owners? Your opinion is an arbitrary assertion, and really has no bearing on reality or principle. At exactly what point does a parent get justification to kill a child in your opinion, and who decides?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit