RE: Message to @haejin and @ranchorelaxo + Flag Targets

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Message to @haejin and @ranchorelaxo + Flag Targets

in abuse •  7 years ago 

I am using standard, widely received definitions. You are resorting to name calling instead of addressing my point. You are not making yourself look very good, sir.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

"The suppression or prohibition of any parts of books, films, news, etc. that are considered obscene, politically unacceptable, or a threat to security."

Oxford Dictionary

So, is that your definition of censorship? I note that on Steemit lowering the upvote amount reduces views, and that reducing it to the point that the post is made invisible does so more. Both of these meet the suppression standard of censorship, rather than the strawman of 'reduced incentives' you put out.

It's not about looking good now man, he's fucking pissed for all the shit he had to go through because of the shitty torture those pathetic scummy trolls ever-so-kindly graced him with.

Man, try to look at this whole shit from his point of view -

Imagine you were been bullied, roasted, name-called, spammed at, been a target of racist comments and so many other negative shit, and that too for almost two straight fuckin years - every. single. day. right from the minute one.

Tell me @inertia, would you still talk the way you're talking now; with "manners", "class" and whatnot?

Eagerly awaiting for your reply.

"It's not about looking good now man, he's fucking pissed for all the shit he had to go through because of the shitty torture those pathetic scummy trolls ever-so-kindly graced him with.

Man, try to look at this whole shit from his point of view -"

I've been looking at this from several points of view. I can see the validity of some of the points of view directed at Haejin.

Maybe Haejin should also look at some of the comments and maybe scale back his daily posts. As a compromise.

Personally, I think it's cool that Haejin is making for his posts. But if he's posting 10 times a day and making roughly the same on every post. Maybe he should scale back a little and let others have a shot of making that money.

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

Thanks for the straight-forward reply, man; missed it a lot around here. looking at you @inertia

I don't give straight replies to people who are all over the place. I had a main point: removal of incentive is not censorship. All I got as a reply was name-calling and you defending the name-calling. There's no point in going over that.

If it's not censorship what is it? Dictating the content and manner in which the content a content provider provides... kind of sounds like censorship.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment
  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

According to many in the community. They feel that, Haejin is "raping the reward pool".

If he will not change. The sentiment will continue. And nothing will change. And will probably just get worse.

Much like Haejin is free to do what he wants with his stake. Others are also free to do what they want with their stake. And that freedom will result in downvotes.

It now boils down to. Who's willing to downvote the longest. And it seems those in the anti Haejin crowd are willing to go the distance.

The next year should be interesting.

popcorn.gif

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

do your homework Yes....more like 10+ months....but then again, that's like 5 years in crypto-time

This shit be like dat one planet in Interstellar dj lmfao

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  7 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment

So I need to edit my comment because you can't follow along with my point? Also, what's with the sock puppet?

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment