No. I don't think you read the article clearly. Firstly the point was made that bots are a reality now, they are probably not going away. Beyond that the article talked about needing communities and supporting each other assuming members make QUALITY content and follow proper academic standards in posting. Beyond that it explained how to write in an academic fashion. It also asked for proposals as to how Steem could be changed for the better. Read it again. ;)
RE: ADSactly Steem Commmunity - What Constitutes Abuse and What Type of Content is Suitable for High Value Upvotes?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
ADSactly Steem Commmunity - What Constitutes Abuse and What Type of Content is Suitable for High Value Upvotes?
i did bro.. The thing is, steemit wont be the way it was anymore.. We might never be able to see good content on trending page. No1 here is for good content, its just about the money. Have u seen 2 lines or just a photo type poss on trending page? when peole like me confront them, we get flagged. its becoming a sad fact.
Do you know i have posted a 100 times i guess as to how can we make steemit a better place again, they flag me for spamming, why? coz im trying to tell everyone to change steemit and make it genuine.
10 similar posts get then same answer from me..
I might be flagged again, but these are the points iv been making. Taking a risk one more time:
a) We need good content on trending page, and no 2 liners or only specific content related or of specific members only or just a dinner shot.
b) Bots should review the posts before upvoting.
c) Need genuine Meritocracy, not fake (Give Fair chance to everyone, not just the rich)
d) Meetups/Programmer related posts should be funded privately, and not by trending, This is not called good content. Need a separate page for it like an UPDATE or ANNOUNCEMENT page without votes.
e) Or You can remove Trending and Hot page, so people will only look for content they are intrested in, using search bar or tags, & not upvote only for rewards.
f) We also need Reward limits and Posts limit. I guess if we keep max 200$ per post and max 5 posts, that comes to 1000$ per day means 30000$ per month. Which is morethan enough for any one to live life in any part of the world. and obviously you can invest in steem/SBD or other cryptos. This will also limit greed.
g) Also a minimum reward like 50 cents to 1$ (more or less i leave to experts) for every post with a minimum content (bots can handle this im sure) will give a boost to minnows, and will also lead to genuine wealth distribution.
h)Flagging should be removed, and i have seen and experienced personal grudges being removed by the whales who rarely posts due their high deligated power, and just flags the posts of members they dont like for whatever reason.
All the above points will eliminate the "Central Banking System for the Rich only" & "FB/YouTube content sensoring" type scenarios thats going on on steemit.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit