You know how ants leave pheromones to let other ants know where to go? Well as Dana-Edwards has pointed out, this is kind of how Steem works. Your votes create a neural network of sorts, leading other steamians to the best content.
So, it isn't rocket science to move this idea to code.
Simple Starting Pieces
First you allow people to put up very simple rules or pieces of logic. From this they can create a computer-like device.
With these simple building-pieces they have a ‘computer’, which they can now program or instruct to do anything.
Electronic principles of logic gates and circuits could be the inspiration for initial coding. Maybe slightly more advanced programmability and fuzziness could be available in each of these pieces or instructions.
Neural Networking
Anyone can add code or rules, but based on votes only the best stuff becomes obvious.
So voting is like Steem. When you vote for a block of code, each edge and node receives so much of the vote. (I want to call edges ‘stems' or ‘lines' for some reason.) The larger the conglomeration of 'code' you vote for, the more influence you exert, but with less focus. The smaller the code block, the more focused the vote becomes.
Voting for specific code strengthens pathways. Using code could strengthen pathways as well, using the same or different units.
Distribution of Each Vote
The formula for voting influence is P = SQRT( n ) / n, where each piece getting up-voted is P, and n is the number of pieces.
Users Choose What to Run
Anyone using this large computer chooses what code to use. What does he choose? It depends on what he wants. He could basically run the program himself, all the code being online. He could use an interpreter of some sort with customizable settings.
The user may not choose every piece of code by hand. He may have to trust other people's opinions or copy their settings with a few tweaks.
Voting may have ‘colors’ so that different categories could be represented. Based on the color, a different behavior or function is manifested.
So let me explain
You get out your interpreter. You want to run a cool program someone suggested, on this Smart Commons. You copy and past some settings, and then run the program. The settings may be specific nodes and branches to use, or may be rules of how to choose pathways.
In the second case, your 'program' may run even better than expected or may not function quite right, as it used to.
Vision of The NMC’s Purpose
Here's a vision of what could happen. A bunch of people start adding nodes representing very simple logic. It's a game at first with tiny helloworld type results.
Then some intelligent people work together and build a cool evolving computer brain type thing, which takes commands.
Or someone makes an actual computer that takes specific commands. It could even have a compiler.
The point is a simple computer would be built which then could help interpret other pathways or code people add, to simplify things for more ordinary people.
So instead of one choosing a version or branch of code to run from Github, the system is constantly evolving real-time.
Simplest Unit
I'm not sure what this most simplest of logic units would be, but it might involve simple bit-math. It could be slightly more evolved than electricity logic. (It may be based on the Borg… just kidding.)
I should go into this more, but it should be very simple, possibly having blockchain, network or broadcast type capabilities.
Run-Time
This may mean having pulses or waves that push execution of operations. Both bitcoin and computers depend on a kind of heart beat which ensures safe completion of execution-blocks.
The above paragraph assumes that there is some online version of constantly running code, but my initial idea is to have a fluid set of rules only. All execution of rules would be done by individual users. Of course, as they get results they could be re-inserted into the 'computer' and voted on.
Conclusion
This idea is to simply allow anyone to put up code or logic and have people vote on the most useful pathways. Then each user chooses how to use it or what to run.
Steamster @doesntmatter recently suggested something related to this but much more basic, which reminded me of this idea.
https://steemit.com/beyondbitcoin/@faddat/the-steem-blockchain-needs-a-versioned-json-schema-and-some-other-stuff
Dana-Edwards:
https://steemit.com/tauchain/@dana-edwards/how-to-prevent-tauchain-from-becoming-skynet
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This smallest unit could be called a bean. This is what I would create: The possibility of And-Or-Not gates where 0s and 1s can be inserted. This is like electronics. A typical computer can be built from this.
Some other communication and bean-unit math could be useful. For example, in plants energy, moisture and light is transferred through paths or channels. Maybe the edges or branches of this system could divide value or tokens over multiple pathways influencing what happens in a new way from electronics.
Timing is an issue, or is it? Computers have a kind of beat they follow, but what if the system regulated its own happenings and quantum type functionality were available.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit