Forms of Government in my view

  Anarchy is the condition of a society, entity, group of people, or a single person that rejects illegitimate hierarchies.[1] It originally meant leaderlessness, but in 1840, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon adopted the term in his treatise What Is Property? to refer to a new political philosophy, anarchism, which advocates stateless societies based on voluntary associations. In practical terms, anarchy can refer to the curtailment or abolition of traditional forms of government.   

Feudalism was the medieval model of government predating the birth of the modern nation-state. Feudal society is a military hierarchy in which a ruler or lord offers mounted fighters a fief (medieval beneficium), a unit of land to control in exchange for a military service.   

Fascism  As an economic system, fascism  is socialism with a capitalist veneer. The word derives from fasces,the Roman symbol of collectivism and power: a tied bundle of rods with a protruding ax. In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism. 

Communism a theory or system of social organization in which all property is owned by the community and each person contributes and receives according to their ability and needs. By direct experience we know this ended up with totalitarian dictatorships. 

Democracy government by the people; especially : rule of the majority (b:) "a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation (this representation is what is prevalent today in western society]). Doesn't excite me, referendums in which people express their wills or opinions are only good for dividing a nation.  

 Of these. in theory probably the best are Communism and Democracy, but in the end what we have in each and every one of these systems is a group of people, an elite if you will who will in the end take control of the productivity and the power, so in the end it all ends up the same, the few having all the perks and the many making these perks available for the few. And for those anarchists out there, I hope you can understand that if anarchy came to pass it would quickly evolve into the strongest owning everything. 

So what is the solution? In my opinion there is no solution, man is simply unable to take a situation where he can have an advantage for himself and not take it. Except if we came into an age of brotherly love, but somehow I'm not counting on that.

Of course this isn't all that is available just a small overview.

That is my view what is yours?